Solution Code : 1ADGB
This Assignment is related to "Accounting Case Study" and experts atMy Assignment Services AU successfully delivered HD quality work within the given deadline.
Case Study 1
Case Study 2
Case Study 3
These assignments are solved by our professional Accounting at My Assignment Services AU and the solution are high quality of work as well as 100% plagiarism free. The assignment solution was delivered within 2-3 Days.
Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Case 1
The marker value of the organization in descending order is as follows (‘000):
Case 2
Nick Scali Ltd
Kathmandu Holdings Limited
Joyce Corp Ltd
Super Retail Group Ltd
Case 3
Nick Scali Ltd
1. a. Growth of EPS for NCK over the five years to 30th June 2015
Basic EPS 2010: 13.9
Basic EPS 2015: 21.1
Growth of EPS
[(21.1/13.9)^1/5] – 1 = 8.71%
b. The Asset Turnover Ratio, Net Profit Margin, Net Debt to Equity Ratio, Leverage Ratio and Return on Equity for the company for both financial years
2009/10: AUD$’000
2014/15: AUD$’000
The Net Profit Margin = Net Profit/ Revenue x 100
2009/10: (11511/96365) x 100% = 11.95%
2014/15: (17408/155743) x 100% = 11.18%
Leverage Ratio = Average Assets/ Average Equity x 100
2009/10: {[(41075 + 32171)/2]/ [(21430 + 18424)/2]} x 100 = 183.79%
2014/15: {[(96337 + 80426)/2]/ [(46226 + 40130)/2]} x 100 = 204.69%
Return on Equity = Net Profit/ Average Equity x 100
2009/10: 11511/ [(21430 + 18424)/2] x 100% = 57.77%
2014/15: 17408/ [(46226 + 40130)/2] x 100% = 40.32%
Net Debt to Equity Ratio = Total Debt – Cash/ Equity x 100
2009/10: [(0 – 17312)/ 21430] x 100 = -80.73%
2014/15: [(12062 – 33680)/ 46226] x 100 = -46.77%
Asset Turnover Ratio = Revenue/ Average Assets
2009/10: 96365/ [(41075 + 32171)/ 2] = 2.63x
2014/15: 155743/ [(96337 + 80426)/ 2] =1.76x
2. For the purpose of purchasing plant and equipment if Nick had raised $50 million, ROE will not change. However the Debt to Equity ratio of the organization will undergo a change.
Assets: Increase
Liabilities: Increase
Equity: No change
2014/15:
Return on Equity = Net Profit/ Average Equity x 100
17408/ [(46226 + 40130)/2] x 100% = 40.32%
2014/15:
The Net Debt to Equity = Total Debt + 50000 – Cash/ Equity x 100
{[(12062 + 50000) – 33680]/ 46226} x 100 = 61.40%
For the purpose of purchasing plant and equipment if Nick had raised $50 million, ROE will not change. However the Debt to Equity ratio of the organization will undergo a change.
Assets: Increase
Liabilities: No change
Equity: Increase
2014/15
Return on Equity = [Net Profit/ (Average Equity + 50000)] x 100
17408/ {[(46226 + 40130)/2] + 50000} = 18.68%
2014/15
The Net Debt on Equity Ratio = [(Total Debt – Cash)/ (Equity + 50000)] x 100
[(12062 – 33680)/ (46226 + 50000)] x 100 = (22.46%)
Kathmandu Holdings Limited
1. a. Growth of EPS for KHL over the five years to 30th June 2015
Basic EPS in 2010: 0.3
Basic EPS in 2015: 10.1
Growth of EPS
[(10.1/0.3)^1/5] – 1 = 102.04%
b. The company KMD for both financial years
2009: NZ$’000
2010: NZ$’000
Leverage Ratio = Average Assets/ Average Equity x 100
2009/10: {[(319414 + 349385)/2]/ [(239127 + 132686)/2]} x 100 = 179.88%
2014/15: {[(430451 + 408297)/2]/ [(313314 + 302146)/2]} x 100 = 136.28%
Asset Turnover Ratio = Revenue/ Average Assets
2009/10: 245812/ [(319414 + 349385)/2] = 0.73x
2014/15: 409372/ [(430451 + 408297)/2] = 0.98x
The Net Profit Margin = Net Profit/ Revenue x 100
2009/10: (5292/245812) x 100 = 2.15%
2014/15: (33868/409372) x 100 = 8.27%
Return on Equity = Net Profit/ Average Equity x 100
2009/10: [5292/ (239127 + 132686)/2] x 100 = 2.85%
2014/15: [33868/ (313314 + 302146)/2] x 100 = 11.01%
Net Debt to Equity Ratio = Total Debt – Cash/ Equity x 100
2009/10: [(53965 – 4736)/ 239127] x 100 = 20.59%
2014/15: {[(39 + 70976) – 1700]/ 313314} x 100 = 22.12%
2. For the purpose of purchasing plant and equipment if KHL had raised $50 million, ROE will not change. However the Debt to Equity ratio of the organization will undergo a change.
Assets: Increase
Liabilities: Increase
Equity: No change
2014/15:
Return on Equity = Net Profit/ Average Equity x 100
[33868/ (313314 + 302146)/2] x 100 = 11.01%
2014/15:
The Net Debt to Equity = {[(Total Debt + 50000) – Cash]/ Equity} x 100
{[(39 + 70976 + 50000) – 1700]/ 313314} x 100 = 38.08%
1. For the purpose of purchasing plant and equipment if KHL had raised $50 million, ROE will not change. However the Debt to Equity ratio of the organization will undergo a change.
Assets: Increase
Liabilities: No change
Equity: Increase
2014/15
Return on Equity = [Net Profit/ (Average Equity + 50000)] x 100
[33868/ (313314 + 302146)/2 + 50000] = 9.47%
2014/15
The Net Debt on Equity Ratio = [(Total Debt – Cash)/ (Equity + 50000)] x 100
[(39 + 70976) – 1700)/ (313314 + 50000)] x 100 = 19.08%
Joyce Corp Ltd
1. Growth of EPS for JCL over the five years to 30th June 2015
Basic EPS 2010: -39.4
Basic EPS 2015: 16.2
EPS Growth
[(16.2/ (-39.4))^1/5] – 1 = -183.7%
b. The Asset Turnover Ratio, Net Profit Margin, Net Debt to Equity Ratio, Leverage Ratio and Return on Equity for the company for both financial years
2009/10: AUD$’000
2014/15: AUD$’000
The Net Profit Margin = Net Profit/ Revenue x 100
2009/10: (-8147/21990) x 100 = (37.05%)
2014/15: (5221/34737) x 100 = 15.03%
Leverage Ratio = Average Assets/ Average Equity x 100
2009/10: {[(44440 + 45407)/2]/ [(15691 + 24243)/2]} x 100 = 224.99%
2014/15: {[(45814 + 36618)/2]/ [(26450 + 22730)/2]} x 100 = 167.61%
Asset Turnover Ratio = Revenue/ Average Assets
2009/10: 21990/ [(44440 + 45407)/ 2] = 0.49x
2014/15: 34737/ [(45814 + 36618)/ 2] = 0.84x
Return on Equity = Net Profit/ Average Equity x 100
2009/10: {(-8147)/ [(15691 + 24243)/2]} x 100 = (40.78%)
2014/15: 5221/ [(26450 + 22730)/2] x 100 = 21.23%
Net Debt to Equity Ratio = Total Debt – Cash/ Equity x 100
2009/10: [(12602 + 286) – 4180)/ 15691] x 100 = 55.5%
2014/15: [(22 + 5300) – 5962)/ 26450] x 100 = (2.42%)
2. For the purpose of purchasing plant and equipment if JCL had raised $50 million, ROE will not change. However the Debt to Equity ratio of the organization will undergo a change.
Assets: Increase
Liabilities: Increase
Equity: No change
2014/15:
Return on Equity = Net Profit/ Average Equity x 100
5221/ [(26450 + 22730)/2] x 100% = 21.23%
2014/15:
The Net Debt to Equity = Total Debt + 50000 – Cash/ Equity x 100
{[(22 + 5300 + 50000) – 5962]/ 26450} x 100 = 186.62%
3. For the purpose of purchasing plant and equipment if JCL had raised $50 million, ROE will not change. However the Debt to Equity ratio of the organization will undergo a change.
Assets: Increase
Liabilities: No change
Equity: Increase
2014/15
Return on Equity = [Net Profit/ (Average Equity + 50000)] x 100
5221/ {[(26450 + 22730)/2] + 50000} = 6.99%
2014/15
The Net Debt on Equity Ratio = [(Total Debt – Cash)/ (Equity + 50000)] x 100
[(22 + 5300) – 5962]/ (26450 + 50000)] x 100 = (0.84%)
Super Retail Group Ltd
1. EPS growth of SRGL five years to 30th June 2015
Basic EPS 2010: 34
Basic EPS 2015: 49.4
EPS growth
[(49.4/34)^1/5] – 1 = 7.76%
b. The Net Profit Margin, Asset Turnover Ratio, Leverage Ratio, Net Debt to Equity Ratio and Return on Equity for the company for both financial years
2009/10: AUD’000
2014/15: AUD $m
Net Debt to Equity Ratio = Total Debt – Cash/ Equity x 100
2009/10: [(9008 + 100000) – 30220)/ 270557] x 100 = 29.12%
2014/15: [(389.8 + 2.2) – 13.1)/ 765.3] x 100 = 49.51%
Asset Turnover Ratio = Revenue/ Average Assets
2009/10: 938765/ [(522246 + 437771)/ 2] = 1.95x
2014/15: 2241.2/ [(557.7 + 555.4)/ 2] = 4.03x
Leverage Ratio = Average Assets/ Average Equity x 100
2009/10: {[(522246 + 437771)/2]/ [(270557 + 156354)/2]} x 100 = 224.88%
2014/15: {[(557.7 + 555.4)/2]/ [(765.3 + 760.4)/2]} x 100 = 72.96%
Return on Equity = Net Profit/ Average Equity x 100
2009/10: 37305/ [(270557 + 156354)/2]} x 100 = 17.48%
2014/15: 82.6/ [(765.3 + 760.4)/2] x 100 = 10.83%
The Net Profit Margin = Net Profit/ Revenue x 100
2009/10: (37305/938765) x 100 = 3.97%
2014/15: (82.6/2241.2) x 100 = 3.69%
2. For the purpose of purchasing plant and equipment if SRGL had raised $50 million, ROE will not change. However the Debt to Equity ratio of the organization will undergo a change.
Assets: Increase
Liabilities: Increase
Equity: No change
2014/15:
Return on Equity = Net Profit/ Average Equity x 100
2014/15: 82.6/ [(765.3 + 760.4)/2] x 100 = 10.83%
2014/15:
The Net Debt to Equity = Total Debt + 50 – Cash/ Equity x 100
{[(2.2 + 389.8 + 50) – 13.1]/ 765.3} x 100 = 56.04%
3. For the purpose of purchasing plant and equipment if SRGL had raised $50 million, ROE will not change. However the Debt to Equity ratio of the organization will undergo a change.
Assets: Increase
Liabilities: No change
Equity: Increase
2014/15
Return on Equity = [Net Profit/ (Average Equity + 50)] x 100
{82.6/ [(765.3 + 760.4)/2] + 50} x 100 = 10.16%
2014/15
The Net Debt on Equity Ratio = [(Total Debt – Cash)/ (Equity + 50)] x 100
[(2.2 + 389.8) – 13.1]/ (765.3 + 50)] x 100 = 46.47%
Find Solution for Accounting assignment by dropping us a mail at help@gradesaviours.com along with the question’s URL. Get in Contact with our experts at My Assignment Services AU and get the solution as per your specification & University requirement.
Trending now
The Student Corner
Subscribe to get updates, offers and assignment tips right in your inbox.
Popular Solutions
Popular Solutions
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨
Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡
Grab it while it's hot!🔥
Claim Your DiscountHurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀