Book All Semester Assignments at 50% OFF! ORDER NOW

Non-Christian Worldview - Humanity - Origin And Nature Of The Universe - Assessment Answer

January 25, 2017
Author : Ashley Simons

Solution Code: 1CGB

Question: Non-Christian Worldview

This assignment falls under Non-Christian Worldview which was successfully solved by the assignment writing experts at My Assignment Services AU under assignment help service.

Non-Christian Worldview Assignment

Assignment Task

Compare and contrast a non-Christian Worldview of your choice with a Christian Worldview. In addition to a brief overview, choose ONE or TWO key aspects to discuss in more detail (examples include: the origin and nature of the universe, the sense of the ultimate (or nature of God), humanity, spiritual practices, or the nature of the good life).

The assignment file was solved by professional Non-Christian Worldview experts and academic professionals at My Assignment Services AU. The solution file, as per the marking rubric, is of high quality and 100% original

(as reported by Plagiarism). The assignment help was delivered to the student within the 2-3 days to submission.

Looking for a new solution for this exact same question? Our assignment help professionals can help you with that. With a clientele based in top Australian universities, My Assignment Services AU’s assignment writing service is aiding thousands of students to achieve good scores in their academics. Our Non-Christian Worldview assignment experts are proficient with following the marking rubric and adhering to the referencing style guidelines.

Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.


Different people tend to have different views on the origin of the universe as well as the operations and processes that take place on the universe. The difference in the way in which people view the world forms different worldviews. The worldviews can be classified as either Christian as well as non-Christian. As such, the paper compares one of the non-Christian worldview and the Christian worldview. The paper discusses the naturalism worldview and compares it with the Christian worldview. The paper begins with a discussion of the articles that give appropriate information about the different worldviews and progresses to compare the naturalism and the Christian worldview.

Gauch Jr, Hugh G. "Science, worldviews, and education." In Science, worldviews and education, pp. 27-48. Springer Netherlands, 2006.

This article gives information about the different worldviews that exist in the world. The article gives both the Christian and non-Christian worldviews that shape the direction of the easement.

Habermas, Jürgen. Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays. Polity, 2008.

In this particular book, a comparison between naturalism as a non-Christian worldview with other worldviews is done (Habermas and Jürgen 2008). The information contained in the book is important as it gives the relevant information needed in writing the essay.

Kanitz, Lori. "Improving Christian worldview pedagogy: Going beyond mere Christianity." Christian Higher Education 4, no. 2 (2005): 99-108.

This article offers important information about the Christian worldview and what should be done to overcome the powers of the other worldviews (Kanitz and Lori 2005). Using the information in this article was important in highlighting on some of the important characteristics of Christians that makes it easy to be compared with the other non-Christian worldviews.

Kim, D., Fisher, D., & McCalman, D. “Modernism, Christianity, and business ethics: a worldwide perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 90 (1), (2009) 115-121.

In this article, the characteristics of Christians against that of other worldviews are offered. The article states some of the elements in modern Christianity and compares it with the other aspects of people who believe in different worldviews. As such, the article gets important as it offers important insights on how different people from different backgrounds view the world and all its processes. Applying the information of this article in the essay was thus considered an important thing.

Mayhew, Matthew J. "Exploring the essence of spirituality: A phenomenological study of eight students with eight different worldviews." NASPA Journal, 41, no. 4 (2004): 647-674.

In this particular study, students from different worldviews were examined. The examination was made to come up with a clear distinction of the kind of beliefs that they believed in and their key differences (Pennock and Robert 2001). As such, the article brings out the differences of the eight wolves clearly thus making it easier to apply the information offered in the essay. The information has contributed greatly towards developing this particular essay.

Pennock, Robert T. "Naturalism, evidence, and creationism: the case of Phillip Johnson." Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives 98 (2001): 77.

This article discusses naturalism as a worldview. As a result, the characteristics that are presented by the naturalists are clearly stated thus making it very easy to note the differences between the Christian worldviews and the naturalist worldviews (Pennock and Robert 2001). The article is important in bringing about the required information needed to develop a better essay by giving quantifiable inputs into the essay.

Polkinghorne, John. "Review: Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics. Philosophical, Theological and Scientific Perspectives." The Journal of Theological Studies 54, no. 1 (2003): 460-461.

This article brings forth different creation worldviews from different believers. By doing this, the author of this article makes it clear the origin of the cosmos and the critics that have been raised by different people who have different beliefs (Polkinghorne and John 2003). As such, through the information provided by the article, it gets very easy to make a comparison between the presented worldviews that are linked to the development of the universe.

Slife, Brent D., and Matthew Whoolery. "Are the psychology’s main methods biased against the worldview of many religious people." Journal of Psychology and Theology 34, no. 3 (2006): 217-231.

In this article, the worldviews of the majority of the people are discussed in details. The article looks at the worldviews of different religions by studying people from different backgrounds (Slife, Brent and Matthew 2006). This makes it easy to note the difference between these people, thus making the comparison done in the paper easy and effective.

  • Introduction

The process if presenting the worldview for Christians has been termed as a thorough as well as an attractive process that happens to be a powerful apologetic for those individuals who happen to believe in the Christian faith (Gauch and Hugh 2006). Thus, the consistency, as well as the illustrative power and the scope of the Christian worldview, tend to talk greatly for itself for the sole reason that it explains all that we experience and see in the globe. To understand the Christian worldview properly, it gets important to understand the standards of the other competing worldviews (Habermas and Jürgen 2008). As such, this paper will present one of the existing non-Christian worldviews that will be compared to the Christian worldview and bring out the key differences that are evident in the two worldviews. The paper will discuss naturalism as the key non-world view and compare it with the Christian view.

  • Naturalism

One of the greatest rivals of the Christian view is the naturalism view. The naturalism, non-Christian view holds to the fact that the only thing that is in existence is matter and that there is strictly no God for those who believe in this worldview (Pennock and Robert 2001). The believers of this view hold to the fact that there is no existence of God, and everything that takes place in the world is natural. The naturalism worldview can be termed as the atheist evolutionists. Unfortunately, a large pool of people who believe in other worldviews such as the moralistic, agnostics, and even those individuals who believe in the Christian view have been seen to adapt a number of elements that are linked to this worldview (Habermas and Jürgen 2008).

In an example, when the deists lost their hopes in the God mentioned in the Bible, the move was seen as a step to give up on God completely. This is because, all in all, if people happen to discover, understand, and solve the presented issues through science, human reasoning, and technology, then there is actually no need for people to have the faith and knowledge of God. As Sire has explained it in theism, God is defined as the infinite-personal Creator as well as the sustainer of the whole globe (Kanitz and Lori 2005). According to the deism view, God is greatly reduced as they view him as having lost his personality, but his position as the creator and the sustainer of the globe is maintained. Based on the view of naturalism, the existence of God is further reduced significantly, and his very existence completely vanishes and he does not exist at all (Kim, Fisher, and McCalman 2009).

For purposes of understanding this worldview better, there are a number of issues that need to be addressed by this worldview. One of the issues that need to be addressed is that of understanding what the reality is (Mayhew and Matthew 2004). In this worldview, the term reality is used to mean matter and matter have been defined as existing internally and all that exists in the cosmos. Additionally, the only thing that matters according to this worldview is the universe and it is the object that substitutes God in this particular view. The reality of the matter in this worldview is that the cosmos actually existent in some form in the past (Gauch and Hugh 2006).

Secondly, the issue of understanding the reality around the cosmos is always important to understanding this particular worldview. According to this worldview, the universe happens to exist as a uniformity of cause as well as an effect in a closed system (Pennock and Robert 2001). The meaning of this is that any closed system does not allow for re-adjustments from outside sources as everything in it is usually uniform, and the activities carried out in it are regular. In this, a single cause leads to an effect, and this leads to the cause and effect system in the cosmos. Those who follow this worldview always believe that everything that exists in the universe happens to be physical as well as material in nature (Gauch and Hugh 2006).

The third element to address is that of understanding the meaning of who really a human being is. According to the believers of naturalism, human beings are defined as a complex machine. According to them, the different personalities that different human beings possess are defined as the interrelation of the physical parameters that humans do not entirely understand (Kim, Fisher, and McCalman 2009). The results of everything that humans believe in is usually connected to the existence of matter as well as different chemical and biological processes that have been shaped over the last couple of years. Additionally, the believers of this worldview strongly believe that human beings are some of the unique creatures that exist in the universe although they happen to be the ones that evolved over a short period (Kanitz and Lori 2005).

Again, understanding what exactly happens to humans when they die is also important in understanding this particular non-Christian worldview. Thus, the definition of death, according to the naturalists is the extinction of both the personality and individuality of human beings. According to the naturalist, the existence of hell and heaven are out of the question as they do not even believe in the existence of a supreme being, namely the God, and there is nothing like life after birth to the naturalist. The existence of man and all the processes that take place during their entire lifetime are defined as the result of accidental collocations of atoms that have no linkages with anything to do with life after death (Pennock and Robert 2001).

The other aspect that people ought to understand in this non-Christian worldview is that of understanding why it is even possible for a human being to grasp an idea of the things that they come across. The worldview holds to the fact that, it is through our innate and autonomous human reason that originates from science makes it easy for us to understand the universe better (Slife, Brent and Matthew 2006). In this view, the cosmos are usually understood in its normal state and the naturalists tend to believe in truth despite rejecting the existence of God (Kim, Fisher, and McCalman 2009). The other important aspects that are important for people to understand are differentiating between what is good and what is wrong by following the laid down ethics. Ethics in this type of worldview are termed as being important as it determines what is good and what is not good for the inhabitants of the cosmos thus being very important and differentiating it with the Christian worldview (Mayhew and Matthew 2004).

The worldview also tries to make its followers understand the real meaning of human history and its importance in their existence while in the cosmos. The history of humans, according to the naturalists is defined as the stream of those particular events that are connected by the reason and outcome relationship that happens without any overarching rationale (Polkinghorne and John 2003). History has been defined as the movement of a particular line from one point to the other. Contrary to the belief of the many Christians, who believe in evolution, the naturalists do not have any staunch belief in any type of divinity that could have led to the presence of evolution (Habermas and Jürgen 2008).

By addressing the above-mentioned issues, it is very clear that there are differences in what the naturalists believe in and what Christians believe in. Understanding this will bring about a better understanding of the contrast between the Christian worldview and the non-Christian worldview (Mayhew and Matthew 2004). The following table will highlight the key differences between the two views, thus comparing them effectively and efficiently.

A comparison of the Naturalist worldview and the Christian Introduction of the innovations introduced to enhance the customer experience.

This Non-Christian Worldview assignment sample was powered by the assignment writing experts of My Assignment Services AU. You can free download this Non-Christian Worldview assessment answer for reference. This solved Non-Christian Worldview assignment sample is only for reference purpose and not to be submitted to your university. For a fresh solution to this question, fill the form here and get our professional assignment help.


Order Now

Request Callback

Tap to ChatGet instant assignment help

Get 500 Words FREE