Solution Code: 1CFI
This assignment falls under Scientific Report which was successfully solved by the assignment writing experts at My Assignment Services AU under assignment help service.
In Rivers Practicals 2 and 3 you undertook a surveying exercise across an urban stream on the Macquarie University campus. You then processed this data and used the discharge and velocity equations to analyse and quantify the flow velocity and discharge characteristics for this stream. You will be using the skills learnt in these practicals (and the lecture on Stormflow) in this assignment.
In this assignment you will:
1) use the information provided below to undertake calculations of flow velocity and discharge for the channel cross section provided and using three different roughness (Manning’s n) values.
2) research the scientific literature using your library database skills to investigate urban stream restoration approaches and their effects on stream flow and storm flow (hydrology). At least 10 scientific references should be used in your assignment including the compulsory reading, Chin et al. (2013).
3) write a scientific report. Only the scientific report is to be handed in to Turn It In. Do not hand in this assignment information and calculation sheet. The Data and Calculations section below should be written up (transferred) to the results section of your report (see section below on report structure).
DATA AND CALCULATIONS – URBAN STREAM CROSS SECTION AND HYDROLOGY
Figure 1 shows a cross section of an urban stream. You will use this cross section to calculate flow velocity and discharge for a range of different roughness (Manning’s n) scenarios.
Remember:
Flow velocity equation
V = [(D2/3) x (S1/2) / n], where
V = mean channel velocity (m/s)
D = flow depth (m)
S = water surface slope (m/m; often approximated by the slope of the bed)
n = Manning's roughness coefficient
Discharge equation
discharge = velocity x cross-sectional area
Q = V x A, where
Q = discharge (m3/s)
V = velocity (m/s)
A = cross-sectional area (m2)
floodplain
Using this channel cross-section, complete Table 1. Channel slope has been provided for you. This table will need to be reproduced as part of the results section of your scientific report.
Table 1 Hydrology of an urban stream at Macquarie University
Channel slope | 0.005 m/m |
Bankfull channel depth | |
Bankfull channel width | |
Channel cross sectional area |
Three different Manning’s n roughness parameters have been provided in Table 2. Use these to calculate the flow velocity and discharge for scenarios 1, 2, and 3. This table will need to be reproduced as part of the results section of your scientific report.
Table 2 Roughness scenarios, flow velocity and discharge characteristics of an urban stream at Macquarie University
Manning's n roughness for scenario 1 (smooth stormwater pipe) | 0.007 |
Manning's n roughness for scenario 2 (moderate in-channel vegetation) | 0.07 |
Manning's n roughness for scenario 3 (woody debris and dense in-channel vegetation) | 0.3 |
Flow velocity for scenario 1 | |
Flow velocity for scenario 2 | |
Flow velocity for scenario 3 | |
Discharge for scenario 1 | |
Discharge for scenario 2 | |
Discharge for scenario 3 |
THE ASSIGNMENT QUESTIONS
1) As part of the introduction - What are the characteristics of stream flow (hydrology) in urban environments?
2) As part of the results - Using the results of your calculations, explain how changing roughness impacts on stream flow hydrology in an urban stream?
3) As part of the discussion - Assume that the aim of urban stream restoration is to reduce flow velocity to improve public safety, minimise sediment erosion and improve physical structure (i.e. geomorphology). What types of restoration/rehabilitation can be undertaken to achieve these aims? [Hint: read Chin et al. (2013) and take a walk around campus for examples (Mars Creek behind Y3A, University Creek between Research Park Drive and Innovation Rd)].
4) As part of the discussion - What might be some additional benefits of undertaking urban stream restoration (e.g. on stream ecology and/or water quality)?
SCIENTIFIC REPORT PRESENTATION
You will present this assignment as a scientific report with appropriate referencing. Below is a rough guide of the proportion of the report that should comprise each section. Your scientific report will comprise the following:
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Reference list
The assignment file was solved by professional Scientific Report experts and academic professionals at My Assignment Services AU. The solution file, as per the marking rubric, is of high quality and 100% original (as reported by Plagiarism). The assignment help was delivered to the student within the 2-3 days to submission.
Looking for a new solution for this exact same question? Our assignment help professionals can help you with that. With a clientele based in top Australian universities, My Assignment Services AU’s assignment writing service is aiding thousands of students to achieve good scores in their academics. Our Scientific Report assignment experts are proficient with following the marking rubric and adhering to the referencing style guidelines.
IntroductionThe fluvial system gets affected drastically by the changes in the urbanization more than any other activities by the human. In the paper by Chin et al., 2013, it has been shown how urbanization affects the river channels and what the nature of it is. They also show how the changes in land coverage and hydraulic as well as sediment affect the channel morphological properties and also the aquatic life.
Urban channels can be produced up to fifteen times larger compared to its natural counterparts due to the morphological (Bernhardt et al, 2002,2005) adjustments. They give plans for the scope for the fluvial geomorphology which takes into a complete approach with the restoration wherever possible. These are in line with an urban future which can easily be sustained (Hobbs et al, 1996).
Earth’s surface is changed when the natural land cover is replaced with the impervious surfaces by the urbanization. Sewers and different flood prevention measures leads to the changes in the water course and also to the river networks. Hydrolofical and sedimentological process gets disrupted in the process and causes the alterations in the river channel geometry.
Restoration of urban streams is not only expensive but also very difficult compared to the case where resotoration is done in less densely inhabited catchments. The extent to which spatial urban restoration can be achieved is limited by the high value of the property as well as densely packed human infrastructure (like roads and sewer lines). The storm waters and the allied sediment and pollutant leads to the limitation in the scope for the restoration to adverse effects (Bernhardt, E.S. and Palmer, M.A. 2007).
Catchment urbanization usually causes the streams to change in the direction of three axes 1) simple geomorphic change in the heterogeneity of the area and also the reduction in the connectivity of the flood plan 2) social value gets diminished in the stream channels making it not worthy and it should be avoided for the recreation purpose 3) as there is simplification in the ecology, stream biodiversity gets reduced and thus the ecosystem of the stream does not function (Alberti et al, 2003). This leads to the reduction in the capacity of the streams and the declined downstream loss of the nutrients. So there are many constraints in the restoration of the urban stream channel and this makes it highly improbable that pre urbanization state of the stream channel will ever be achieved (Bernhardt et al, 2002). The main objective of the efficient restoration should instead be to make the movement (Coulson, H. 1959) of the stream far back in the direction of the three axes to the larger extent possible provided the constraints that exist. As of now, all the restoration efforts are mainly focussed on the channel form restoration and also the maintenance (Arnold C. & Gibbons C. ,1986) of the channel stability in artificial ways upon advancement in the direction of axes 1 and 2. The third axes of the improvising the biological systems/ecology is generally avoided (Brookes, A. ,1988).
The aim of the report is to use the information to calculate the flow velocity and discharge for the channel cross section provided for three different roughness (Manning’s n) values. Detailed research is carried out to examine urban stream restoration approaches and their effects on stream flow and storm flow (hydrology).
Methods
From the cross sectional view of the figure, we get the ban full depth as well as width.
Now ,
Flow velocity equation
We know that for flow velocity
V = [(D2/3) x (S1/2) / n], where
V = mean channel velocity (m/s)
D = flow depth (m)
S = water surface slope (m/m; often approximated by the slope of the bed)
n = Manning's roughness coefficient
Discharge equation
For the discharge
discharge = velocity x cross-sectional area
Q = V x A, where
Q = discharge (m3/s)
V = velocity (m/s)
A = cross-sectional area (m2)
These equations are used to flow velocity and discharge for different scenarios.
Results
From the cross sectional view of the figure, we get the bank full depth as well as width.
Now cross sectional area=depth*width
Table 1 Hydrology of an urban stream at Macquarie University
Channel slope | 0.005 m/m |
Bankfull channel depth | 20 m |
Bankfull channel width | 10 m |
Channel cross sectional area | 200 m2 |
Sample calculation
For scenario 1; Manning’s roughness factor, n=0.007
Flow depth, D= 20 m
Slope, S=0.005 m/m
So, flow velocity,
V=[(D2/3) x (S1/2) / n]
=(202/3 0.0051/2)/0.007
=74.429 m/s
Discharge ,
Q = V x A
=74.429*200 m3/s
=14885.8 m3/s
Table 2 Roughness scenarios, flow velocity and discharge characteristics of an urban stream at Macquarie University
Manning's n roughness for scenario 1 (smooth stormwater pipe) | 0.007 |
Manning's n roughness for scenario 2 (moderate in-channel vegetation) | 0.07 |
Manning's n roughness for scenario 3 (woody debris and dense in-channel vegetation) | 0.3 |
Flow velocity for scenario 1 | 74.429 m/s |
Flow velocity for scenario 2 | 7.443 m/s |
Flow velocity for scenario 3 | 1.737 m/s |
Discharge for scenario 1 | 14885.8 m3/s |
Discharge for scenario 2 | 1488.6 m3/s |
Discharge for scenario 3 | 347.334 m3/s |
As can be seen from the data, with the increase in the manning roughness factor the flow velocity decreases and it also leads to the reduction in the discharge velocity. So the roughness has huge impact on the stream flow.
Discussions
There are five broad methods by the means of which one can manage urban fluvial networks. These comprise land use planning that takes into account the management of the urban area within the catchment, retention of precipitation, urban runoff delaying, and effects management in the urban area and finally plans for the consequences in the downstream.
If the aim of urban stream restoration is to reduce flow velocity to improve public safety, minimise sediment erosion and improve physical structure (i.e. geomorphology), we will use management of effects in the urbanized area and to alleviate probable effects of the urban drainage. The way to do the restoration is by reduction in the channel velocities by incorporating roughness. This will have room for the delayed pollutant loads. As can be seen from the data, with the increase in the manning roughness factor the flow velocity decreases and it also leads to the reduction in the discharge velocity. So the roughness has huge impact on the stream flow. Separation of foul water and storm water system is also required. Channel residence time can also be increased.
There are lot of probable benefits of urban stream restoration which are listed below.
Conclusions
If the aim of urban stream restoration is to reduce flow velocity to improve public safety, minimise sediment erosion and improve physical structure (i.e. geomorphology), we will use management of effects in the urbanized area and to alleviate probable effects of the urban drainage. The way to do the restoration is by reduction in the channel velocities by incorporating roughness. This will have room for the delayed pollutant loads. As can be seen from the data, with the increase in the manning roughness factor the flow velocity decreases and it also leads to the reduction in the discharge velocity. So the roughness has huge impact on the stream flow. Separation of foul water and storm water system is also required. Channel residence time can also be increased.
This Scientific Report assignment sample was powered by the assignment writing experts of My Assignment Services AU. You can free download this Scientific Report assessment answer for reference. This solved Scientific Report assignment sample is only for reference purpose and not to be submitted to your university. For a fresh solution to this question, fill the form here and get our professional assignment help.
Trending now
The Student Corner
Subscribe to get updates, offers and assignment tips right in your inbox.
Popular Solutions
Popular Solutions
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨
Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡
Grab it while it's hot!🔥
Claim Your DiscountHurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀