DD is the demand curve and SS is the supply curve for the car tires. A was the initial equilibrium point with P* as the equilibrium price and Q* as the equilibrium quantity. An increase the price of rubber used in car tires will lead to shift the supply curve to the left. The supply curve shifts leftwards from SS to SS’. On the other hand an increase in the demand for cars will lead to shift the demand curve for tires to the right. The demand curve shifts from DD to DD”.B is the new equilibrium point in the market for car tires. At the new equilibrium point, the equilibrium price will increase from P* to P** but the direction of the change in equilibrium quantity remains indeterminate. It depends on the relative magnitude of the shift of the demand and supply curve (Smriti Chand, 2016)
Apples and pears are assumed to be substitutes to each other. An increase in the price of pears will lead to increase the demand for apples. The demand curve shifts to the right from DD to DD” .Market equilibrium price now becomes to P. The producers in competitive market act as price takers and hence their demand curve is D=AR=MR. The individual producers does not have any market power and there by no control over price. They determine the profit maximizing output at the point where Price (same as Marginal revenue) equals to marginal cost. The individual producers earn positive economic profit in the short run as shown by the green shaded rectangle.
This positive economic profit will attract other firms to enter in the market because free entry and exit are allowed in the competitive market. As a result the market supply curve will shift to the right from SS to SS” and then market price will come down. The entry of new firms will continue until all the positive economic profit is being eliminated. The long run equilibrium price for apple will be set at the minimum point of ATC. Firms will earn only normal profit in the long run. No firms will have any incentive either to enter or to exit in the long run (Roger A. Arnold, 2008).
Italian economy is reported to sink back to recession in 2012. A contraction of economic activities is witnessed across the economy. Estimated study reveals that Italian economy is recorded a contraction of 2.4% during 2012. Unemployment rate has reached to double digit. The consumer spending has reduced to a significant extent. A continuous weakness in aggregate demand pulls the economy in recession. This can be shown with the help of following diagram:
Economic collapse continued in 2013 in Italy. The condition of Greece was also bad but Italy was literally not manageable. The economic indicators mentioned above clearly indicate that the economy still remains weak and feeble. Economic contraction was forecasted at -1.5% in 2013. Economic growth tells only a little part of the story. There was massive job loss due to cut back in Industrial production. Unemployment rate has shown an upward trend continuously. Consumers had more pessimistic view about the economic outlook and this was reflected by the drastic fall in consumption expenditure. Automobile industry, one of the most promising industries in Italy has shown a 40% decline. The weakness in aggregate demand continues for another more year – the economy has moved further away from potential level. The economy further moves from AD to AD’ and produce lesser output at Y2.
At the bottom line, despite the third largest economy in Eurozone, Italian economy has entered into deep recession. Actually the above sources and other economic data confirm that economic crisis continues to be worsening in Italy in 2013. Political leaders have proven their inability to implement the required reform to bring back macroeconomic stability. Structural problems also remain intense during this period. Improving the situation of the economy became a huge challenge to the leadership (Hans-Jürgen Schlamp.2013).
Based on the above graph it can be said that
In January 2013, the unemployment rate was 11.3%
In July 2013, the unemployment rate was 12.1%
Labor force participation rate in Jan-13
(20000000/40100000)*100= 49.87531%
Labor force participation rate in July-13
(27000000/40900000)*100 = 66.01467%
An increasing labor force participation rate will exert an upward pressure on the unemployment rate. This is because the marginally attached workers are back to the labor force and come under the computation of official measure.
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
Speak directly with a qualified subject expert.
Get clarity on your assignment, structure, and next steps.
In this free session, you can: