As an independent director dealing with the Amtek Auto Corporate Governance Scam case in India, I would have played a critical role in defending the fundamentals, theories, and principles of corporate governance to lessen the impact of the scam. In the year, 2022, the Amtek Auto scandal revealed serious shortcomings in corporate governance in India (Felman et al. 2022). As an independent director as described above, I would have addressed the scandal in this academic paper by outlining the steps I would have done while taking into account various corporate governance theories and elements.
A whistleblower's report was forwarded to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and even the Prime Minister's Office in May 2022, which revealed an alleged Rs 12,000 crore fraud by Amtek Auto promoters (Felman et al. 2022). Arvind Dham, the promoter of Amtek Auto, 27 members of the company, and a few unnamed IDBI Bank employees are all the targets of the complaint, which requests a criminal probe (Felman et al. 2022). The Amtek group of firms owes the banks an estimated Rs. 25,000 crores, and the complaint claims that the scam went on for more than 10 years (Rashid et al. 2022).
On account of the principles of corporate governance, I would support a quick, unbiased internal inquiry to determine the origins, scope, and participants of the scam as an independent director. To ensure accountability and transparency throughout the process, it would be necessary to designate an independent committee or forensic auditors. It is critical to swiftly inform stakeholders of the investigation's conclusions once it's over (Mishra et al. 2021). A thorough report on the swindle, its effects on the company's financial health, and suggested corrective measures to avoid recurrences would uphold transparency.
In order to maintain efficient supervision and reduce conflicts of interest, I would argue for increasing the percentage of independent directors on the board. This would entail talking to shareholders about potential changes to the board's makeup and making sure independent directors have the right training and experience (Kolev et al. 2019). I would advise the creation of specialized committees like audit, risk, and pay committees to strengthen board independence. In order to further increase openness and accountability, these committees would make sure that crucial parts of the company's operations were carefully investigated and supervised by independent directors.
The use of effective risk management systems and procedures is something I would emphasize. In order to identify vulnerabilities and implement preventative actions to limit potential hazards, this would entail completing a thorough risk assessment (Larasati and Asrori 2020). It would be essential to disclose risk management procedures on a regular basis in order to inform decisions and stop fraud of the same kind in the future.
I would support the creation of a thorough code of ethics that spells out what conduct is expected of all directors and staff. This code should be enforced through training programs, regular evaluations, and severe disciplinary actions for infractions. It should also cover integrity, honesty, and ethical decision-making (Fernando and Muralidheeran 2019). In addition, I would suggest the creation of a private, impartial whistleblower system to promote a culture of openness and responsibility. This will enable prompt investigation and corrective action by giving staff members, stakeholders, and even directors a secure avenue to report any possible misbehavior.
I will call a board emergency meeting to discuss the scandal, stress the seriousness of the problem, and the necessity of taking prompt action to win back the trust of stakeholders during this meeting, and discuss the following primary goals:
I will create a thorough communication plan to meet the worries and interests of stakeholders. This includes:
To reduce the risk of fraud, I am going to improve internal control mechanisms such as clear financial transaction norms, regular internal audits, and the separation of roles.
I will carry out a thorough examination of the business's financial reports, internal controls, and operational procedures to find any additional anomalies or flaws that might have aided in the scandal. I am also going to establish strong systems and take fast corrective action to stop similar problems from happening again (Bhagat and Bolton 2019). This can entail:
I will hold the management team responsible for their involvement in the scandal through management accountability. Go ahead and do the following:
As an independent director, dealing with the Amtek Auto crisis necessitates a multifaceted strategy that puts transparency, responsibility, and stakeholder communication first. The organization may start restoring trust, making amends, and adopting stronger corporate governance practices to stop such incidents from happening again by putting the listed procedures into practice.
Bhagat, S. and Bolton, B., 2019. Corporate governance and firm performance: The sequel. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, pp.142-168.
Felman, J., Marwah, V. and Sharma, A., 2022. An Early Examination of the RBI–12 Cases Under the IBC. In Insolvency and Bankruptcy Reforms in India, pp. 9-35. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Fernando, A.C. and Muralidheeran, K.P., 2019. Business Ethics: An Indian Perspective, 3e. Pearson Education India.
Kolev, K.D., Wangrow, D.B., Barker III, V.L. and Schepker, D.J., 2019. Board committees in corporate governance: A cross‐disciplinary review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management Studies, 56(6), pp.1138-1193.
Larasati, D. and Asrori, A., 2020. The Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanisms, Capital Structure and Firm Size on Risk Management Disclosure. Accounting Analysis Journal, 9(1), pp.60-66.
Mishra, A.K., Jain, S. and Manogna, R.L., 2021. Do corporate governance characteristics influence firm performance in India? Empirical evidence using dynamic panel data analysis. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(1), pp.71-82.
Puni, A. and Anlesinya, A., 2020. Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance in a developing country. International Journal of Law and Management, 62(2), pp.147-169.
Rashid, M.A., Al-Mamun, A., Roudaki, H. and Yasser, Q.R., 2022. An overview of corporate fraud and its prevention approach. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 16(1), pp.101-118.
Sakawa, H. and Watanabel, N., 2020. Institutional ownership and firm performance under stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. Sustainability, 12(3), p.1021.
You Might Also Like:
Corporate Governance Assignment Help
What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Corporate Social Responsibility
Shareholder Activism in Corporate Governance Evidence from JSE Listed Companies
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....