2.The SPSS syntax is given below
DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet0.
UNIANOVA Failures BY Time
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/POSTHOC=Time(TUKEY)
/PLOT=PROFILE(Time)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(OVERALL)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Time)
/PRINT=OPOWER HOMOGENEITY DESCRIPTIVE
/PLOT=SPREADLEVEL RESIDUALS
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN=Time.
3.The SPSS output is given below
The Levene’s test for equality variance test is used to check the assumption of homogeneity of variances. The value of F test statistic is F (3, 12) = 1.245 and its corresponding p – value is 0.337 > 0.05. Since the p – value of F test statistic is greater than 0.05, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the assumption of homogeneity of variance is satisfied
The value of f test statistic is7.343 and its corresponding p – value is 0.005 < 0.05, indicating that there is a significant difference in the mean number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen during a 30-minute test period among four different time periods of sleep. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant effects of sleep deprivation on subjects’ ability to perform a vigilance task, such as locating objects moving on a radar screen
Conclusion
The value of f test statistic is7.343 and its corresponding p – value is 0.005 < 0.05, indicating that there is a significant difference in the mean number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen during a 30-minute test period among four different time periods of sleep. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant effects of sleep deprivation on subjects’ ability to perform a vigilance task, such as locating objects moving on a radar screen. The post hoc test was performed to determine which time pair mean number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen differs significantly. Tukey post hoc test was used and the findings suggest that respondents who enrolled in 28 hour sleep group found more number of number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen when compared to that of respondents placed in 4 hours and 12 hours group
4.The trend analysis is not appropriate for this design, as the readings are measured on a fixed time based but on the exact time basis. When a set of measurements of a certain process are measured on a time series, trend estimation can be used to justify the readings and trends about the data.
5.The mean number of number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen by participants enrolled in 28 hour sleep group is 61.75 ± 6.133 (95% CI: 48.387 – 75.113), the mean number of number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen by participants enrolled in 20 hour sleep group is 57.5 ± 6.133 (95% CI: 44.137 – 70.863), the mean number of number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen by participants enrolled in 12 hour sleep group is 37.75 ± 6.133 (95% CI: 24.387 – 51.113), and the mean number of number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen by participants enrolled in 4 hour sleep group is 26.5 ± 6.133 (95% CI: 13.137 – 39.863). Thus, we see that the respondents who enrolled in 28 hour sleep group found more number of number of failures to spot objects on a radar screen when compared to that of respondents placed in 4 hours and 12 hours group
6.The SPSS syntax is given below
REGRESSION
/DESCRIPTIVES MEAN STDDEV CORR SIGN
/MISSING LISTWISE
/STATISTICS COEFF OUTS CI(95) R ANOVA COLLIN TOL
/CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10)
/NOORIGIN
/DEPENDENT Failures
/METHOD=ENTER Twelvehour Twentyhour twentyeighthour
/RESIDUALS HISTOGRAM(ZRESID) NORMPROB(ZRESID).
The SPSS output is given below
The regression equation is
No of Failure = 26.5 + 11.25 * Twelve Hour + 31 * Twenty Hour + 35.25 * Twenty eight Hour
The value of F test statistic is 7.343 and its corresponding p – value is 0.005 < 0.05, indicating that the estimated regression model is good fit in predicting number of failure spot objects on a radar screen
The coefficient of determination is 0.647. This indicates that the regression model which was constructed to predict future values of number of failure spot objects on a radar screen explains 64.7% of the variation in the dependent variable number of failure spot objects on a radar screen
The coefficient of the independent variable twelve hour is 11.25. This indicates that, when the participant is from 12 hour sleep group, then the number of failure spot objects on a radar screen increases by 11.25 units, provided the other independent variables held constant, but statistically insignificant (t test statistic = 1.297, p – value = 0.219 > 0.05)
The coefficient of the independent variable twenty hour is 31. This indicates that, when the participant is from 20 hour sleep group, then the number of failure spot objects on a radar screen increases by 31 units, provided the other independent variables held constant and statistically significant (t test statistic = 3.574, p – value = 0.004 < 0.05)
The coefficient of the independent variable twenty eight hour is 35.25. This indicates that, when the participant is from 28 hour sleep group, then the number of failure spot objects on a radar screen increases by 35.25 units, provided the other independent variables held constant, but statistically insignificant (t test statistic = 4.064, p – value = 0.002 < 0.05)
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
Speak directly with a qualified subject expert.
Get clarity on your assignment, structure, and next steps.
In this free session, you can: