Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka Critical Analysis Assignment Sample

Subject Name : Arts and Humanities

Introduction

There is a complex interaction of sociopolitical, economic, historical, and identity issues that have produced the ethnic strife in Sri Lanka between the Sinhalese and Tamil groups. This research study provides a critical analysis of the conflict by investigating its origins, growth, and current state. In addition, it examines how conflict themes like violence, cultural divisions, and language policy present themselves and how ethnic identities change in relation to political identities (Manogaran et al, 1993). The article also assesses the societal effects of the conflict and the success of reconciliation initiatives. Last but not least, it offers viable remedies, such as the devolution of authority, the acknowledgement of cultural diversity, and the involvement of civil society, the international community, and transitional justice institutions, to pave the way for a peaceful and inclusive future in Sri Lanka.

The Sinhalese majority is Buddhist, whereas the Tamil minority is Hindu, and these two groups are at odds with one another. Conflicts have arisen between these groups because of their different cultural, linguistic, and religious backgrounds and their competing goals of gaining political influence, maintaining traditional ways of life, and expanding economic possibilities.

The conflict worsened once colonial rule ended, giving rise to ethnic political parties and military insurgencies that fought for over three decades (Manogaran et al, 1993). Human rights were violated and a great deal of misery was endured on all sides of the conflict. Significant economic setbacks, infrastructure damage, and entrenched animosity across communities are only some of the far-reaching effects of the battle.

An examination of the role of nationalism, ethnicity, and identity politics in the Sri Lankan ethnic conflict is the primary goal of this research work. This study tries to understand the origins, dynamics, and solutions to the conflict between the Sinhalese and Tamil people by analyzing the historical, political, and social aspects of the conflict.

In order to complete these tasks, a thorough research strategy will be used. To do so, I will be reading widely throughout the works of academics like Calhoun, Kapferer, Brubaker, and others who have shed light on the nuanced nature of ethnic conflicts and nationalist ideologies. Secondary sources, such as reports and empirical data, will be used to back up the analysis and flesh out the research's picture of the conflict.

This study seeks to add to the current body of knowledge on ethnic conflicts and give a greater understanding of the complexity involved through a critical examination of the Sri Lankan ethnic conflict. In addition, it aims to explain how factors like nationalism, ethnicity, and identity politics influenced the evolution of the conflict (Kapferer et al, 2001). This study's results and analyses can form the basis for peacebuilding, reconciliation, and conflict resolution initiatives in Sri Lanka, among other places.

The Sinhalese and the Tamils are the two main groups involved in the ethnic strife in Sri Lanka. The Sinhalese make up the bulk of the population and are mostly located in the country's southern and central regions. They have long held positions of political and economic influence in Sri Lanka, and their culture is deeply rooted in the country's history. The Sinhalese people consider themselves to be guardians of the island's culture, and they have frequently highlighted their connections to the ancient kingdoms and civilizations that formerly flourished there.

The Tamil people, however, are primarily Hindu and live in the northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka. Tamil is their language, and their Dravidian heritage has given them a distinct culture. The Tamil people have actively worked to safeguard and advance Tamil culture, language rights, and political interests (Hyndman et al, 2007). The Tamil people, feeling wronged by years of discrimination and marginalization, have now called for more freedom to make their own choices.

The political parties in Sri Lanka have played a crucial role in the war by advocating for their communities' goals and interests. These groups have been essential in influencing the conflict dynamics, speaking up for their communities' rights and demands, and rallying others to their cause.

There are two main Sinhala-majority political parties in Sri Lanka: the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) and the United National Party (UNP). The Sinhalese community has traditionally been represented by these parties, who have taken different methods to resolve the ethnic strife. With leaders like S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike and then his daughter Chandrika Kumaratunga at the helm, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) has taken on a more populist and nationalist platform, championing Sinhala Buddhist identity and Sinhala interests (Calhoun et al, 1993). In contrast, the UNP has adopted a more moderate and liberal stance, emphasizing democratic principles and economic growth for everyone.

The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) is the most visible political organization in the Tamil diaspora. The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) is a group of Tamil political parties that came together to promote Tamil political rights and self-determination. They want a federal style of government, more decentralization of authority, and the right to have one's Tamil culture and language protected. The Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) and the Eelam People's Revolutionary Liberation Front (EPRLF) are two other major Tamil political groups that have played important roles in advocating for Tamil interests and advancing Tamil political goals.

A major role in the conflicts was the terrorist group Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), led by Velupillai Prabhakaran, engaged in a military conflict to create a homeland for Tamil people in northern and eastern Sri Lanka. Violence and instability expanded across the nation as a result of the LTTE's guerilla tactics, suicide bombings, and other acts of terrorism (Kapfere et al, 2001). The conflict dynamics and the response of the Sri Lankan government were both affected by the LTTE's goal for a separate state, known as Tamil Eelam, and their techniques of violence.

These militant groups and ethnic political parties have been instrumental in giving voice to the hopes, fears, and demands of their communities. Both the escalation and possible resolution of the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka may be traced back to their acts, methods, and beliefs.

Historical Development of the Conflict

Sri Lanka's ethnic strife has its roots in the colonial era, specifically the 19th and 20th centuries when the country was under British authority. The British colonial government fostered greater racial and religious inequality through its policies. The British used a divide-and-rule tactic that incited animosity between the Sinhalese and Tamil people, fueling preexisting tensions.

Tamils, who lived mostly in the north and east, were given preferential treatment by the British in terms of access to school and government jobs (Hyndman et al, 2007). As a result, many Sinhalese began to feel resentful of what they saw as Tamil privilege. Ethnic conflicts were exacerbated by British policies that favored plantation workers, the vast majority of whom were Tamils of Indian descent.

Several landmark dates and events have marked the course of the Sri Lankan ethnic conflict:

The British left Sri Lanka in 1948, and a government led by Sinhalese was quickly established. The Tamil-speaking community was already at a disadvantage before the Sinhala Only Act of 1956 officially recognized Sinhala as the country's only official language.

In 1958, there were widespread anti-Tamil riots that led to several deaths. This was a watershed moment in the rise of racial hostilities.

To further alienate the Tamil population, Sri Lanka approved a new constitution in 1972 that declared the country a republic and strengthened Sinhala Buddhist nationalism.

The civil conflict in Sri Lanka began in 1983 when the assassination of 13 Sri Lankan troops by Tamil rebels sparked the Black July riots (Kapferer et al, 2001). The violence escalated as a result of the large departure of Tamils from Colombo, the capital.

The Indo-Sri Lanka Accord was signed in 1987 to end ethnic violence and give the Tamil-dominated territories some degree of self-government. But the agreement was met with opposition, and it did not produce a sustainable solution.

The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were defeated by the Sri Lankan military in 2009, marking the end of the country's civil war. Extreme violence and humanitarian catastrophes marked the conflict's concluding stages.

Sri Lanka's civil war between government troops and the LTTE was the worst episode of the country's decades-long ethnic struggle. Approximately 100,000 people lost their lives and countless others were injured, displaced, or subject to human rights abuses during the civil war, which lasted from 1983 to 2009. The war exacerbated existing racial tensions, weakened societal bonds, and sowed the seeds of distrust.

The war's effects on society have been far-reaching and complex. It has caused internal migration and displacement of people and their families. Schools, hospitals, and houses have all been impacted by the destruction of infrastructure. The war has made it harder for economies to grow and has deepened poverty in certain areas (Brubaker et al, 2009). Post-conflict reconciliation and rebuilding are difficult because social divides, distrust, and trauma endure.

Sri Lankan society has been profoundly and permanently impacted by the historical evolution of the ethnic war, which was shaped by the colonial legacy and characterized by significant events and dates. The complexity of the conflict and the development of initiatives for enduring peace and reconciliation need an appreciation of its historical background.

Reasons for the Conflict

The ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka has its origins in a web of causes that spans politics, economics, and history. The Sinhalese and Tamil communities' long-standing frustrations, tensions, and hopes may be traced back to the aforementioned causes.

The conflict's underlying sociopolitical cause is an imbalance in the allocation of resources, power, and opportunity. The Sinhalese majority in the government is seen as discriminatory by the Tamil minority, who feel they have less of a voice in government and fewer opportunities for economic and social advancement (Scott et al, 2003). The Tamils' anger and feeling of injustice have been stoked by these inequalities, prompting them to push for more freedom of choice and expression.

Disparities in economic resource distribution and development have contributed to the conflict. Northern and eastern Sri Lanka, where the Tamil minority is the largest, have lagged behind the more wealthy Sinhalese-dominated south and west in terms of economic growth. Discontent and economic gaps across communities have grown as a result of a lack of equitable economic opportunities and development initiatives.

A long line of wrongdoings, grudges, and divergent interpretations of history have all left their mark on the battle. The Sinhalese and Tamil groups each have their tales of the past that they use to justify their own goals and objectives. The Sinhalese are proud of their long history and deep links to the island, while the Tamils are as proud of their unique culture and longstanding presence in the island's northern and eastern regions (Scott et al, 2003). Polarisation and animosity between the populations may be traced back to divergent historical accounts and conflicting narratives of victimhood.

The ethnic strife in Sri Lanka has been fueled in large part by nationalism, ethnicity, and identity politics. Both the Sinhalese and the Tamil populations have used the ideology of nationalism to promote their own distinct identities and further their own political goals. Tamil nationalism has worked to defend the rights and interests of the Tamil minority, whereas Sinhalese nationalism, generally connected with Sinhala Buddhist doctrine, has strengthened the majority group's control and cultural identity.

The Sinhalese and Tamil communities each saw themselves as separate ethnic groupings with their own distinct cultural and historical identities, making ethnicity a central factor in the war. Because of this ethnic awareness, groups have become increasingly divided and competitive with one another, fueling a sense of shared identity, solidarity, and even exclusivity.

The violence has been exacerbated by identity politics inspired by ethnic and nationalist ideology. Support for the Sinhalese and Tamil political parties has been bolstered via the use of ethnic identity politics and the highlighting of community-specific issues (Spencer et al, 1990). Divisions have been widened and progress toward reconciliation and peaceful cohabitation has been stymied by the politicization of ethnic identities.

The ethnic strife in Sri Lanka has been fueled by several interrelated variables. The Sinhala Only Act, enacted in 1956, was one policy that actively discriminated against the Tamil-speaking people and contributed to rising ethnic tensions. The LTTE and other militant organizations have used violence to achieve their goals since political channels have failed to meet their demands.

During the conflict, both populations endured discrimination and human rights violations, but the Tamil community was hit worse by both (Höglund et al, 2011). Finding a lasting resolution to the issue has been hampered by the absence of efficient institutions for power-sharing, devolution, and fulfilling the genuine demands of the Tamil people.

It is impossible to examine the war without considering the part played by foreign players and international dynamics. The trajectory and dynamics have been affected by interference from regional and global powers, geopolitical interests, and conflicting forces.

Identity Change

Ethnic identification is a person's sense of belonging to an ethnic or cultural group. Shared views, values, customs, language, and historical events define a person's cultural heritage and social identity. Common ancestry, cultural practices, and a sense of belonging to an ethnic community frequently define ethnic identity.

Ethnic identity shapes Sinhalese and Tamil self-perception and group allegiance in the Sri Lankan ethnic war. The Sinhalese identify with Sri Lanka and the Sinhala language, whereas the Tamils identify with the Tamil-speaking portions of the island.

The Sri Lankan ethnic conflict hinges on ethnic and political identities. Ethnic identity drives political mobilization and ethnic political parties. These parties promote ethnic community rights and interests, emphasizing the ethnic-political relationship.

Sri Lankan ethnic and political identities are interwoven. The Sinhalese majority has supported Sri Lanka's two major political parties, the SLFP and the UNP (Scott et al, 1990). They championed Sinhalese nationalism and Buddhist interests.

The Tamil National Alliance (TNA) and Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) reflect Tamil political goals. These parties want autonomy, Tamil language rights, and cultural identity protection.

In Sri Lanka, ethnic communities mobilize behind political ideology and ambitions, transferring identity from ethnic to political. Sinhalese and Tamil political parties have shaped ethnic identities into political movements.

Political platforms have helped people connect with ethnically aligned political ideas by expressing frustrations, demands, and ambitions. This shift from ethnic to political identification has politicized ethnicity and polarised communities along ethnic lines.

The battle has also strengthened ethnic identities by instilling a feeling of communal suffering, injustice, and the desire to defend ethnic rights (Manogaran et al, 2019). History and politics have influenced ethnic identity and political goals, establishing a complicated relationship between the two.

Understanding the Sri Lankan ethnic conflict requires understanding the identity shift from ethnic to political. It emphasizes political ideas, ethnic mobilization, and inclusive political procedures that meet the genuine concerns and aspirations of all ethnic populations.

Conflict Analysis Themes

The ethnic strife in Sri Lanka has manifested itself prominently and destructively via acts of violence. Bombings, assassinations, riots, and a full-scale civil war that lasted over three decades have all occurred during the conflict. Extreme human misery, death, and community dislocation have resulted from violence inflicted by both state and non-state actors.

Rooted ethnic grudges, perceived injustices, and the pursuit of political aims all had a role in fueling the dispute to the point of bloodshed. It has deepened already existing ethnic tensions, kept retaliatory cycles going, and hampered efforts toward a peaceful resolution.

The ethnic violence in Sri Lanka has been exacerbated by cultural differences and ethnonationalism. Separate identities and a "us versus them" worldview have developed as a result of the Sinhalese and Tamil groups' linguistic, cultural, and historical differences.

The conflict has been exacerbated by ethnonationalism, which is motivated by the pursuit of independence and the defense of ethnic interests. Reconciliation attempts have been hampered by the prevalence of exclusive ethnic identities and the privileging of one's group above others.

The ethnic strife in Sri Lanka has been exacerbated by language and educational policy. The Tamil-speaking community was discriminated against and marginalized when the Sinhala Only Act was passed in 1956, making Sinhala the only official language of the country. As a result of this approach, the Tamil community became increasingly estranged and marginalized.

Ethnic divides have been deepened as a result of discrepancies in educational opportunities and legislation. The Tamil community has been held back from advancing in society because of the unfair allocation of resources, lack of access to excellent education, and disregard for the rights of the Tamil language.

Future Directions and Solution

The ethnic strife in Sri Lanka resolved by democratic changes and the devolution of authority. Various ethnic groups may feel more empowered to handle their own needs and goals if the authority were decentralized to the regional or provincial level (Manogaran et al, 2019). Ethnic conflicts can be lowered, and representation and distribution of resources can be made fairer, with the support of a political system that is more open and decentralized.

It is essential for promoting a feeling of inclusion and social cohesion in Sri Lanka to recognize and appreciate the cultural and linguistic variety of the country's many ethnic groupings. The Sinhala and Tamil languages should be given equal recognition and significance in governmental and educational contexts, and efforts should be made to encourage bilingualism and multilingualism (Kapferer et al, 2001). Equally important is fostering opportunities for people of all backgrounds to enjoy and share their cultural traditions.

Conflict-affected communities rely heavily on the efforts of civil society organizations for peacebuilding, reconciliation, and redress. In addition to advocating for the rights of underrepresented communities, they can serve as a forum for open discussion and mutual understanding. Building trust and encouraging reconciliation may be aided by supporting and enabling civil society organizations to participate in conflict resolution projects and promoting interethnic discussion.

The participation of the international community in aiding Sri Lanka's attempts to end the ethnic war is also crucial (Kapferer et al, 2001). Promoting peace and guaranteeing the preservation of human rights can benefit from diplomatic pressure, mediation, and the deployment of resources and expertise (Kapferer et al, 2001). To redress historical grievances and establish responsibility for crimes committed during the conflict, international players can aid in encouraging discourse, monitoring human rights breaches, and supporting transitional justice procedures.

Redressing victim complaints and fostering a climate of forgiveness are two of the goals of transitional justice systems including truth commissions, reparations, and court proceedings. Healing the scars of the conflict and restoring trust among communities requires the establishment of procedures that give victims truth, justice, and restitution.

Conclusion

Violence, long-standing grievances, and social differences have characterized the Sri Lankan ethnic strife between Sinhalese and Tamil groups. It's important to grasp the conflict's history, origins, and persistence. In this research study, we examined the parties, historical backdrop, causes, identity development, conflict themes, social impact, and possible remedies.

Colonialism fostered ethnic tensions and inequities, causing the war. Dates and events have shaped the conflict, prolonging it and causing death, relocation, and economic hardship. Nationalism, ethnicity, and identity politics have fueled the conflict.

Ethnic and political identities have intermingled, transferring identification from ethnic to political domains. Ethnic and political identities have exacerbated violence.

We've seen how ethnic grudges and political goals have caused bloodshed. Cultural differences, ethnonationalism, and language and educational policies have deepened divisions, marginalizing particular populations and impeding socioeconomic mobility.

The war has harmed societal cohesiveness, development, and well-being. However, reconciliation, peacebuilding, and justice efforts have continued to heal scars, establish understanding, and promote accountability. Evaluate and enhance civil society, the international community, and transitional justice activities.

Devolution of power, political reforms, cultural and linguistic diversity, civil society, the international community, and transitional justice may help resolve the conflict. These methods target fundamental issues, encourage inclusion, and hold perpetrators accountable.

The Sri Lankan ethnic conflict resolved via peace, reconciliation, and human rights. Addressing concerns, bridging differences, and building a cohesive and inclusive society requires political will, dialogue, and collaboration among all stakeholders. Sri Lanka can achieve peace, tranquility, and prosperity for all by learning from the past, recognizing diversity, and supporting social justice.

References

Manogaran, Chelvadurai. "A Political Solution to the Ethnic Conflict in Sri Lanka." Refuge: Canada's Journal on Refugees/Refuge: Revue canadienne sur les réfugiés 13, no. 3 (1993): 23-26.

Kapferer, Bruce. "Ethnic nationalism and the discourses of violence in Sri Lanka." Communal/Plural 9, no. 1 (2001): 33-67.

Hyndman, Jennifer. "The securitization of fear in post-tsunami Sri Lanka." Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97, no. 2 (2007): 361-372.

Calhoun, Craig. "Nationalism and ethnicity." Annual review of sociology 19, no. 1 (1993): 211-239.

Kapferer, Bruce. "Ethnic nationalism and the discourses of violence in Sri Lanka." Communal/Plural 9, no. 1 (2001): 33-67.

Brubaker, Rogers. "Ethnicity, race, and nationalism." Annual Review of Sociology 35 (2009): 21-42.

Scott, David. "Culture in political theory." Political theory 31, no. 1 (2003): 92-115.

Spencer, Jonathan, Richard Handler, Bruce Kapferer, R. S. Khare, Dennis B. McGilvray, Gananath Obeyesekere, Daniel A. Segal, and Martin Southwold. "Writing within: anthropology, nationalism, and culture in Sri Lanka [and comments and reply]." Current Anthropology 31, no. 3 (1990): 283-300.

Höglund, Kristine, and Camilla Orjuela. "Winning the peace: conflict prevention after a victor's peace in Sri Lanka." Contemporary Social Science 6, no. 1 (2011): 19-37.

Scott, David, and C. Geertz. "The demonology of nationalism: on the anthropology of ethnicity and violence in Sri Lanka." International Journal of Human Resource Management 19, no. 4 (1990): 491-510.

de Silva Wijeyeratne, B. Roshan. "Session 8 Re-envisioning Sri Lanka-Lessons-learned & Challenges and Opportunities States of Mind and States of History: The Future in Sri Lanka Can Be Decentered."

Manogaran, Chelvadurai, and Bryan Pfaffenberger. The Sri Lankan Tamils: Ethnicity and Identity . Routledge, 2019.