The assessment tasks a B-BBEE Consultant to prepare a comprehensive management report on three key areas: Compare and contrast the former and the latest Employment Equity Act (Gazette no. 48418) and the effects on the Management Control Element (MC element) to the organization (40% weighting) Discuss the place of Skill Development in the attaining of the new Employment Equity Act included as part of Management Control for organizations (25% weight) Include approaches and measures that companies should take for the attainment of intended objectives and for a long-term change to optimise points in Management Control (35% weighting). The assignment has stress on the knowledge control segment, evaluation of insights and appreciation of the internal and external environment in relation to Management Control and Skills Development Scorecard. Students are for instance discouraged from regurgitating information word by word but should rather try and explain the information as can be applied.
Synopsis
A very effective feature of the solution is that it offers an extensive overview of how the new Employment Equity Act affects Management Control. Some of key changes can include: hiring quotas, new definition of ‘employer,’ and industry bespoke charters. Such changes are underlined in the response referring to the new approach in the transformation of the workplace, together with the enhanced engagement of leaders. The need for Skill Development is described as essential in the implementation of the new Act as it helps build capacities among disadvantaged persons and increase diversity, and also secure reliable talent sources. The perceptions depict it as an enabler of social changes involving breaking of barriers as well as enabling representation. These measures also entail formulation and enactment of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policy, DEI targets in the strategic map, promoting diversity in the hiring process, DEI performance indicators, and inclusion, and improving the learning culture. This way, the solution offers a skills development scorecard with various weightings and compliance ones and a list of strategies indicating the corresponding targets.
The evolution from the old Employment Equity (EE) legislation to the New Employment Equity Act (EEA), as outlined in Gazette no. 48418, has introduced significant changes to workforce demographics reporting and mandatory hiring targets for designated groups in South Africa. This section analyses the key differences between the old and newly amended EEA, and their implications for companies’ compliance and performance in the Management Control element of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) codes.
The old Employment Equity Act of 1998 laid the foundation for addressing workplace inequalities by centering on the promotion of equality and the eradication of discriminatory practices (Horwitz and Jain, 2011). This law mandated the business companies to work towards equal representation of the designated groups, which included women, Black individuals as well as person suffering from disabilities (Government Gazette, 1998). The focus predominantly revolved around achieving numerical targets in the workplace, aiming to ensure a fair distribution of opportunities across these groups (Thomas, 2003). However, there was a significant change in the legislative environment with the release of Gazette No. 48418, modifying the Employment Equity Act (Government Gazette, 2022). This amendment marked a pivotal transition from merely targeting numerical outcomes to addressing the systemic as well as structural barriers that perpetuate inequality (Government Gazette, 2022). The new legislation broadened its reach to include a broader definition of inclusion, recognizing the various facets of diversity.
In addition to addressing enduring disparities, Gazette No. 48418 aimed to support a more comprehensive and sophisticated approach to workplace reform (Government Gazette, 2022). It recognized the importance of not just representation but substantive participation and empowerment of marginalized groups within the organizational framework (Thabethe, 2022). Therefore, by highlighting the necessity of systemic changes, policies, and practices that promoted a truly inclusive and fair work environment, the amendment sought to bring about more significant change.
One of the most significant changes brought about by the new Employment Equity Amendment Act is the implementation of mandatory talent acquisition quotas that selected firms must satisfy within specific time frames (Government Gazette, 2022). Unlike the old employment regulation, which required companies to submit annual reports on their workforce demographics to the Department of Labor for monitoring fairness, the amended legislation establishes quantifiable minimum thresholds for hiring of targeted marginalized groups (Steenkamp, 2023). The old regulations had no mandatory hiring targets which the companies had to meet - the report was for monitoring purposes only (Steenkamp, 2023). Whereas, the new Employment Equity Amendment Act (EEA) (Government Gazette No. 48418) legally require all medium to large enterprises with 50 employees or more to ensure their new recruitment attains a minimum of 60% Black (African, Indian, Colored) candidates, 30% women, and 4% people with disabilities within the first year (Government Gazette, 2022). Moreover, the employers are required to provide data submissions demonstrating the escalating hiring targets for each designated group each year. Failure to comply with these targets may result in fines amounting to 10% of turnover (Steenkamp, 2023). So, it can be said that the objectives outlined in the amendment act as a spur for firms to reevaluate their hiring practices, allocate resources towards diversity and inclusion programs, and set policies in place to assist in the hiring and retention of members of targeted groups.
The designation of employer status has changed, with an upper limit of 50 employees implemented in the new amendment (Gazette no. 48418) replacing the old regulations with a lack of a designated threshold. This change marks a critical redefinition in the obligations and responsibilities of companies (Government Gazette, 2022). Under the previous regulations, the absence of a specified threshold meant that all companies were encouraged to comply with employment equity reporting requirements, irrespective of their size or number of employees (Steenkamp, 2023). This often led to varying degrees of commitment and accountability across different-sized enterprises. However, with setting the upper limit of 50 employees in new Employment Equity Amendment Act, a more structured and stratified approach has been established (Utete, 2022). It can be said that the business firms in the private profit and non-profit sectors, surpassing this employee count are now designated employers and consequently subjected to enhanced reporting duties and specific hiring targets (Utete, 2022). This limit brings clarity and specificity to the obligations imposed on companies, delineating a more defined set of responsibilities for larger entities.
Compared to the previous legislation, which did not have any sector-specific provisions, the modified framework includes industry charters. This marks a significant change in the way employment equity and transformation objectives are adapted to different economic sectors (Busse et al., 2023). Unlike the old Employment Equity Act of 1998, where a standardized approach prevailed across industries, the new amendment (Gazette no. 48418) framework gives the government the authority to publish industry-specific equity requirements negotiated by charter councils comprising of relevant stakeholders (Utete, 2022). This shift toward industry charters signifies a move beyond the confines of standardized regulatory requirements (Busse et al., 2023). It heralds a more flexible and nuanced approach that acknowledges the diverse economic realities and dynamics of various sectors such as finance, mining, and construction.
The New Employment Equity Act (EEA) encourages businesses to incorporate employment equity goals at the core of their strategic planning. This entails a fundamental shift in approach. It involves reinventing the company's vision and mission to reflect a commitment to diversity, inclusion, and equity (Thabethe, 2022). In previous acts, meeting quotas might have sufficed, but now, the emphasis is on a holistic cultural transformation. This means reevaluating how decisions are made, how leadership is cultivated, and how opportunities are distributed within the organization (Nkos, 2023). It's an appeal to businesses to support an environment where workers feel appreciated, respected, and empowered to contribute their best. The business companies are now required to ensure that every decision, every policy, and every action aligns with the overarching transformation goals (Utete, 2022). The new amendment focuses on creating a work atmosphere where inclusion is a lived experience for every employee and where diversity is not merely acknowledged but cherished (Steenkamp, 2023).
Leadership accountability becomes more crucial under this new framework. The business companies are encouraged to ensure that their leadership actively drives transformation and diversity initiatives (April and Govender, 2022). This shift toward greater responsibility is about empowering leaders who actively promote diversity and effect real change, not just about having a diverse representation in leadership positions (April and Govender, 2022). The framework encourages leaders to go beyond rhetoric and make actual efforts to create an environment in which every voice is heard and appreciated (Thabethe, 2022). Moreover, the business companies must gather and monitor data more thoroughly in accordance with the modified EEA. It is essential to determine whether policies are actually causing change rather than focusing only on the numbers (April and Govender, 2022). This implies that in order to successfully achieve transformation goals, the companies must constantly assess as well as modify their strategy. The new framework encourages the companies to move beyond meeting regulatory requirements and focus on creating an organizational culture that truly embodies diversity, inclusion, and equity (April and Govender, 2022).
Although implementing these new amendments into the company policies can create some challenges that may impact the traditional working of the business companies. It might require a cultural shift within the organization, a re-evaluation of existing policies and practices, along with redefining success factors in terms of management control (Steenkamp, 2023). However, it is also an opportunity for companies to take proactive steps towards creating a more equitable and diverse workplace. It is based on reimagining leadership, decision-making processes, and strategies to ensure that every individual, regardless of background, holds an equal chance to contribute and thrive within the organization (April and Govender, 2022).
Skill development is critical in enabling and equipping persons from historically underprivileged backgrounds to actively participate in the workforce and advance to positions of leadership (Papadopoulos and Jones, 2023). Strategic skill building programs aligned with the objectives outlined in South Africa's new Employment Equity Act (EEA), operate as catalysts that break down barriers, promote representation, and build sustainable talent pipelines for enhanced management control (Steenkamp et al., 2022).
At the most fundamental level, prioritized skills training initiatives aimed at marginalized populations serve to combat inequality by providing the tools and competencies needed for increased employability and workplace participation (Alao and Brink, 2022). The purposeful skill augmentation eliminates the historical skills gap, whether through formal learning interventions, job-based training, mentoring programs, or career development planning (Darling-Hammond et al., 2022). This increases financial accessibility and provides the skills to the specific groups to actively seek jobs as well as make significant contributions to the objectives of the company, and become eligible for further advancement opportunities (Alao and Brink, 2022).
The initiatives for skill development serve as a strategic tool in advancing diversity and representation across organizational roles. By actively promoting the acquisition of critical skills and competencies among members of specified groups, they go beyond the idea of merely numerical representation (Alao and Brink, 2022). By providing necessary training for skill development so as to succeed in leadership and decision-making positions, the businesses ensure that diversity isn't merely a symbolic gesture but rather a crucial component of how their organizations operate. This deliberate empowerment helps to create a more inclusive management structure in which the varied viewpoints are respected for their contribution to enhanced decision-making processes and new solutions (April and Govender, 2022).
Crucially, the skill development initiatives play a pivotal role in nurturing a pipeline of competent leaders from historically marginalized groups (Alao and Brink, 2022). Individuals from these backgrounds can rise into higher-level employment with the help of specially devised programs that aim to improve their skills and abilities (Darling-Hammond et al., 2022). This deliberate focus not only addresses the issue of underrepresentation, but also expands the organization's talent pool by bringing a diverse range of ideas and skills to the table. By supporting a more diverse and creative leadership cadre, these programs complement the new EEA's focus on leadership accountability and diversity in management control.
Moreover, the programs aimed at developing skills serve as a concrete manifestation of an organization's commitment to significant change in compliance with the requirements of the EEA (Steenkamp et al., 2022). The business organizations demonstrate a proactive commitment to attaining employment equity goals by allocating resources towards focused training and development initiatives for specific populations. This investment indicates a purposeful attempt to support a diverse and inclusive workforce, going beyond simply fulfilling legislative requirements (Papadopoulos and Jones, 2023). Such a proactive approach presents the organization as a leader in cultivating a diverse environment. Companies that demonstrate a sincere desire to promote inclusivity not only meet legal requirements but also create a culture that values and celebrates diversity (Steenkamp et al., 2022). As a result, this sets the standard for progressive and fair workplace practices.
Additionally, the skill development initiatives play a pivotal role in shaping a culture of continual growth and learning within organizations. Businesses that place a high priority on continual skill development foster an atmosphere where workers feel appreciated and empowered to advance their careers (Osher et al., 2020). This culture encourages diversity of opinion, which promotes cooperation and creativity and meshes well with the new EEA's values (April and Govender, 2022). It engenders an inclusive atmosphere where all employees perceive opportunities for advancement based on merit and capability rather than background. This focus on continuous learning not only supports the goals of the Act but also fosters a dynamic workplace culture in which diversity is actively welcomed and appreciated (Alao and Brink, 2022).
Moreover, the implementation of skill development initiatives is essential to ensuring the long-term sustainability of the organizational transformation initiatives (Hubbart, 2023). When companies invest in enhancing the skills of individuals from historically marginalized groups, they embark on a trajectory that extends far beyond filling immediate skill gaps. These initiatives lay the groundwork for developing a workforce that is both more competent and diverse in the future (Osher et al., 2020). By actively nurturing the skills of individuals from designated groups, the business organizations lay a robust foundation for sustained diversity and inclusion efforts (Alao and Brink, 2022). This strategic approach ensures that the company remains competitive in a rapidly evolving market while simultaneously fulfilling its obligations towards employment equity and societal transformation.
To maximize points in Management Control and drive sustainable change aligned with the objectives of the new Employment Equity Act (EEA), the companies need to implement robust policies and strategies that embed diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) into their organizational DNA. Some of the key policies and strategies which the companies can apply to achieve desired outcomes as well as foster sustainable change are explained below.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Policy
The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policy serves as a foundational document endorsed by top leadership, highlighting the company's unwavering commitment to fostering an inclusive workplace (Kraus et al., 2021). This policy outlines clear objectives, quantifiable commitments, and the smooth incorporation of DEI principles into all facets of the organization's activities (Kraus et al., 2021). The goal is to establish a culture where diversity is cherished, all voices are heard, and everyone feels valued and respected by incorporating DEI principles into the foundation of all interactions and processes (Chantarat et al., 2022).
Transparent Decision-Making Protocol
The Transparent Decision-Making Protocol lays out clear and visible guidelines for all key processes, including decisions, promotions, and succession planning (de Fine Licht et al., 2020). It places a strong emphasis on the values of justice and meritocracy, ensuring sure that every decision and result is supported by impartial standards and consistent with these values (Shrestha et al., 2019). This policy aims to nurture a culture where merit-based achievements are recognized, encouraging a motivated workforce and bolstering trust in the organization's decision-making processes (de Fine Licht et al., 2020).
The Inclusive Recruitment Policy promotes a thorough hiring process that values diversity and gets rid of prejudices (Swartz et al., 2019). In order to ensure impartial and equitable hiring procedures, it requires the adoption of procedures that actively seek out and interact with a variety of talent pools. This policy seeks to rectify historical disparities in workforce representation by placing a premium on diversity (Swartz et al., 2019).
The Employee Engagement Policy aims to cultivate a thriving work environment by fostering active involvement, motivation, and satisfaction among employees. This specific policy focuses on certain initiatives that encourage open communication, collaboration, as well as a sense of belonging within the organization (Ababneh, 2021). The establishment of platforms and providing opportunities for staff members to express their thoughts, offer suggestions, and take part in decision-making processes is considered to be the top priority of this policy (Ababneh, 2021). The goal is to improve employee morale, productivity, and overall job satisfaction by fostering an inclusive and empowered culture, which will ultimately lead to a dynamic and engaged workforce (Govender and Bussin, 2020).
Establishing a robust diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policy, backed by top leadership can be considered one of the crucial strategies which the business firms can implement to achieve desired outcomes. This strategy of leadership commitment and accountability forms the cornerstone of a company's commitment towards transformation (Epstein, 2018). It can be said that this particular strategy highlights the integration of DEI concepts throughout the organization's operations, outlines specific pledges, as well as specifies attainable objectives (Kraus et al., 2021). In addition, this strategy also ensures that leaders actively promote DEI activities by linking performance reviews and leadership evaluations to these goals (Abasilim et al., 2019). This linkage creates a culture of accountability, compelling leaders to proactively encourage and incorporate DEI values into all facets of business operations (Epstein, 2018).
Another crucial strategy is to integrate DEI goals into strategic planning processes, setting measurable objectives for diverse representation in leadership and decision-making roles. This strategy ensures that DEI isn't an isolated initiative but a strategic imperative deeply ingrained in the company's roadmap for success (Bryson et al., 2018). By coordinating DEI strategies with overarching business goals, an organization can create a culture where diversity remains a driving force behind innovation and advancement (Abasilim et al., 2019). This assists in establishing the idea that diversity and inclusion are integral components essential for the company's sustained growth and long-term vision.
Implementing inclusive hiring policies, leveraging diverse talent pools and ensuring unbiased recruitment processes comes under this significant strategy which helps to maximize management control. This strategy helps the business companies in investing in mentoring programs, leadership development initiatives, and skill enhancement training tailored to historically marginalized groups to nurture a diverse talent pipeline for higher-level positions (de Fine Licht et al., 2020). This strategic initiative not only addresses immediate gaps in representation but also cultivate a robust talent pipeline, preparing individuals from underrepresented backgrounds for higher-level roles.
This strategy centers on implementing rigorous systems to gather comprehensive data regarding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) metrics within the organization. The following strategy seeks to systematically track and analyze numerous metrics connected to DEI activities through the establishment of strong data gathering infrastructure (Oberdorf, 2022). As per the authors McDavid et al., (2018) regular assessments enable the organization to evaluate the efficacy of implemented strategies, identifying areas of success and areas needing improvement. By ensuring that decisions are well-informed, this data-driven strategy helps the company make incremental improvements to its DEI projects.
Another significant strategy is to establish a culture of continuous learning by providing access to learning resources and development opportunities for all employees (Tchamyou, 2020). This strategy emphasizes access to diverse learning resources and development opportunities ensuring every employee can enhance their skills (Tchamyou, 2020). Moreover, this strategy encourages cross-cultural competence training, workshops addressing unconscious bias, and diversity-related seminars, promoting a deeper understanding and appreciation of differences.
Element |
Weighting (Points) |
Compliance targets |
Establishing a robust diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policy |
7 |
75% |
Integrate DEI goals into strategic planning processes, setting measurable objectives for diverse representation in leadership and decision-making roles |
8 |
80% |
Implementing inclusive hiring policies |
6 |
70% |
Establishing rigorous systems to collect organization-wide Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) metrics |
6 |
60% |
Establish a culture of continuous learning by giving all employees learning resources and development opportunities |
7 |
70% |
Ababneh, O.M.A., 2021. How do green HRM practices affect employees’ green behaviors? The role of employee engagement and personality attributes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(7), pp.1204-1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1814708
Abasilim, U.D., Gberevbie, D.E. and Osibanjo, O.A., 2019. Leadership styles and employees’ commitment: Empirical evidence from Nigeria. Sage Open, 9(3), p.2158244019866287. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019866287
Alao, A. and Brink, R., 2022. Strategies for using ICT skills in educational systems for sustainable youth employability in South Africa. Sustainability, 14(24), p.16513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416513
April, R.A. and Govender, C.M., 2022. Understanding affirmative action leadership in the South African financial context. African Journal of Business Management, 16(5), pp.90-103. https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJBM/article-full-text-pdf/D0D50B269230
Bryson, J.M., Edwards, L.H. and Van Slyke, D.M., 2018. Getting strategic about strategic planning research. Public management review, 20(3), pp.317-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285111
Busse, M., Kupzig, N. and Vogel, T., 2023. The impact of black economic empowerment on the performance of listed firms in South Africa. Available at SSRN 4074905. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4074905
Chantarat, T., Rogers, T.B., Mitchell, C.R. and Ko, M.J., 2023. Perceptions of workplace climate and diversity, equity, and inclusion within health services and policy research. Health services research, 58(2), pp.314-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14032
Darling-Hammond, L., Wechsler, M.E., Levin, S. and Tozer, S., 2022. Developing Effective Principals: What Kind of Learning Matters?. Learning Policy Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED620192.pdf
de Fine Licht, K. and de Fine Licht, J., 2020. Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making: Why explanations are key when trying to produce perceived legitimacy. AI & society, 35, pp.917-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00960-w
Epstein, M.J., 2018. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351280129
Govender, M. and Bussin, M.H., 2020. Performance management and employee engagement: A South African perspective. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(1), pp.1-19. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1fa44885f4
Government Gazette, 1998. Employment Equity Act [No. 55 of 1998]. Government Gazette. https://www.labour.gov.za/DocumentCenter/Acts/Employment%20Equity/Act%20-%20Employment%20Equity%201998.pdf
Government Gazette, 2022. Employment Equity Amendment Act, 2022. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/202304/48418employment-equity-amendment-act42022.pdf
Horwitz, F.M. and Jain, H., 2011. An assessment of employment equity and broad based black economic empowerment developments in South Africa. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 30(4), pp.297-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151111135750
Hubbart, J.A., 2023. Organizational Change: The challenge of change aversion. Administrative Sciences, 13(7), p.162. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13070162
Kraus, M.W., Torrez, B. and Hollie, L., 2022. How narratives of racial progress create barriers to diversity, equity, and inclusion in organizations. Current opinion in psychology, 43, pp.108-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.022
McDavid, J.C., Huse, I. and Hawthorn, L.R., 2018. Program evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice. Sage Publications. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ehVoDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT19&dq=regular+assessments+enable+the+organization+to+evaluate+the+efficacy+of+implemented+strategies&ots=ygffWM7yg8&sig=tffrLR0vu7welUgZkoZaHjIk_WI&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=regular%20assessments%20enable%20the%20organization%20to%20evaluate%20the%20efficacy%20of%20implemented%20strategies&f=false
Nkosi, T.G., 2023. Exploring the perceptions of managers concerning the trainee audit programme as an employment equity tool at the Auditor General of South Africa (Doctoral dissertation). https://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/30702/dissertation_nkosi_tg.pdf?sequence=1
Oberdorf, F., 2022. Design and Evaluation of Data-Driven Enterprise Process Monitoring Systems (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Würzburg). https://opus.bibliothek.uni-wuerzburg.de/opus4-wuerzburg/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/29853/file/Dissertation_Felix_Oberdorf.pdf
Osher, D., Cantor, P., Berg, J., Steyer, L. and Rose, T., 2021. Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development 1. In The Science of Learning and Development (pp. 55-104). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650
Papadopoulos, O. and Jones, K., 2023. Training in the age of liberalization and crisis: Understanding the learning experiences of young Active Labour Market Programme Participants. Social Policy & Administration, 57(2), pp.219-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12876
Shrestha, Y.R., Ben-Menahem, S.M. and Von Krogh, G., 2019. Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California management review, 61(4), pp.66-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257
Steenkamp, I., 2023. Employment Equity Act in South Africa: An Analytical Review from 1998–2022 Parallel Session 4.4: Labour Rights: Assessing Effectiveness and Performance. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372518779_Employment_Equity_Act_EEA_in_South_Africa_An_Analytical_Review_from_1998-2022_Parallel_Session_44_Labour_Rights_Assessing_Effectiveness_and_Performance
Swartz, T.H., Palermo, A.G.S., Masur, S.K. and Aberg, J.A., 2019. The science and value of diversity: closing the gaps in our understanding of inclusion and diversity. The Journal of infectious diseases, 220(Supplement_2), pp.S33-S41. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz174
Tchamyou, V.S., 2020. Education, lifelong learning, inequality and financial access: Evidence from African countries. Contemporary Social Science, 15(1), pp.7-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2018.1433314
Thabethe, W., 2022. An investigation of the implementation of the Employment Equity Act (No. 55 of 1998) of South Africa by organisations in Cape Town in the Western Cape (Master's thesis, Faculty of Humanities). http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37370
Thomas, A., 2003. Employment equity practices at selected companies in South Africa. South African Journal of Labour Relations, 27(3_4), pp.6-40. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC59573
Utete, R., 2022. Examining the relationship between employment equity implementation and employee performance at the workplace: Evidence from a leading organisation in South Africa. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11(8), pp.141-152. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i8.2071
You Might Also Like:
Management Consulting Assignment Help
CHC52015 Develop and Review Case Management
Management in Practice Assignment Sample
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨
Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡
Grab it while it's hot!🔥
Claim Your DiscountHurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀