Kick Off Your Assignment for Just $10* Get Started

Question Synopsis 

One of the assessment tasks is that a student is given a role of an Assistant Quantity Surveyor and required to prepare a formal report for a proposed construction of a flyover in Hong Kong with the overall cost of HK$ 540 million and time duration of 56 months. The report must address four main tasks: contract specification and coverage of contract preventive requirements for several parties, identification of selective criteria for contracts and evaluation of contracts, identification of different forms of contracts and selection along with preparation of the right contract form. Each task presupposes several subtasks to be accomplished by the student, including the study of contractual obligations for private and public customers, the evaluation of time, cost, and quality factors affecting the choice of contract, the determination of factors that affect the choice of contract, the comparison of standard contracts, the justification of the choice of a particular type of contract, and the consideration of cooperation between the contractor and the subcontractor. The assessment focuses on problem-solving, effective analysis, as well as application of the content learned in the contract management scenario on a big scale in an infrastructure project.

Synopsis

Answer Synopsis 

The solution encompasses all the needed tasks in one report. It contains an executive summary and the details of the practical contractual specifications for private and government clients and their comparison. This paper presents a clear analysis of the selection criteria of contracts relative to time, cost, and quality; it highlights detailed information on how each factor affects the project. It contains the risk response pertaining to stakeholders together with the risk management plan of action. The solution provides the discussion of different types of contracts and explains why the Design-Build contract was chosen in this case. It also offers suggestions for modifying mainstream contracts to suit clients’ needs and examines the impact of contractor-subcontractor relations on contractual solutions. It is the final recommendations at the project management level on how to achieve success in the project such as having constant communication with the stakeholder’s, the new methods of having unique contracts, and detailed risk management. In general, the solution meets all requirements and shows a profound knowledge of the principles of contract management and their application in relation to the largest infrastructure projects.

Executive Summary

This government summary summarizes main results and suggestions from the examination of the proposed Flyover creation challenge. With an expected fee of HK$540 million and a period of fifty-six months, the problem necessitates a meticulous approach to agreement management. Exploration of contractual requirements found out that industrial and authorities parties had various needs. As a public corporation, the Government of Hong Kong requires felony compliance, transparency, and lengthy-time period viability. Private stakeholders, on the other hand, are concerned approximately cost transparency, on-time final touch, and great assurance. Examining the have an effect on of time, fee, and satisfactory on agreement selection highlighted the sensitive balance required for powerful undertaking control.

A thorough exam of agreement kinds emphasized the want of matching contracts to project difficulties. A Design-Build (DB) settlement turned into selected as a strategic decision to stimulate cooperation at the same time as balancing the purchaser's desires of fee certainty, timely shipping, and satisfactory warranty. Contract guidance hints blanketed personalized changes to common contracts to satisfy client needs. The want of well-defined phrases and situations, price schedules, and warfare resolution techniques became regarded vital for undertaking success. The collaborative interaction among contractors and subcontractors was highlighted as a sizable driver in desirable settlement control.

Finally, the research emphasized the complex interaction of time, cost, and first-class in building contracts. Contract control has developed as a vital factor for addressing stakeholder interests, retaining financial prudence, and negotiating the intricacies of big infrastructure initiatives. High-level hints encompass persisted stakeholder involvement, the take a look at of novel agreement structures, danger management this is robust, and chronic expert development for undertaking teams. These observations and guidelines are meant to aid the powerful execution of the Proposed Construction of the Flyover, even as additionally acting as a beneficial resource for stakeholders involved in comparable huge-scale infrastructure tasks.

Introduction

This file digs into my activity as Assistant Quantity Surveyor, entrusted with preparing, verifying and collating vital settlement papers for the proposed production of a flyover from Chiu Shun Road to Po Yap Road in Tseung Kwan O. The task's complexity needs a complete evaluation of contractual requirements, contract selection standards, analysis of diverse contract sorts, and the subsequent selection and creation of the perfect settlement. This has a look at will manual you through these obligations, shining mild at the subtle details that create the contractual surroundings of this huge infrastructure assignment.

Task 1: Requirements for a Contract

A. Contractual Requirements for a Private Client in the Context of the Project

According to Allen et al. (2022), when it comes to resolving contractual duties for a private client, the most essential component is matching the building challenge with the patron's individual wishes and expectancies. With a HK$540 million assignment cost and a fifty six-month length, the contractual framework ought to painstakingly describe financial criteria, task milestones, and pleasant requirements. Ensuring a clear and jointly agreed-upon payment agenda, price escalation approaches, and strict exceptional standards grow to be essential to serving the goals of the personal purchaser (Hkis, 2023). To lessen uncertainty, the settlement ought to additionally include procedures for dispute resolution, danger distribution, and a radical scope of activities.

B. Contractual Requirements for the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Infrastructure Project

Contractual responsibilities exceed the standard since the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region governs the mission. HK$540 million in public investment calls for a strong resolution that respects financial restraint and public interest (Devb, 2023). The settlement ought to make sure compliance with local legal guidelines and standards through strict regulatory framework adherence. The 56-month project calls for a detailed strategy with milestones that suit authorities’ ambitions. The settlement must include network engagement, environmental impact opinions, and green building methods to make sure inclusion and sustainability. Since authorities are stakeholders, the settlement should highlight obligation, openness, and green useful resource distribution. Risk discount, process mission, and public asset safety should be part of the contractual framework. The authority fulfils its fiduciary duty via organizing uniform audits and reporting (Crawford, 2021).

C. Contractual Requirements of the Government and a Private Stakeholder for This Major Project

As per Gubinelli et al . (2019), when the contractual necessities of the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and a private stakeholder are compared, critical differences get up because of their varied duties and pursuits in the assignment. The key challenge for the private shareholder is protecting their great funding of HK$540 million. To attain a decent return on funding, the contractual structure needs to be adapted to house economic elements together with price schedules, price escalation mechanisms, and threat allocation schemes. The 56-month duration necessitates a simplified creation timetable as a way to minimize economic dangers associated with delays.

In comparison, the government, as a public stakeholder, prioritizes compliance with law, openness, and socioeconomic impact. Aside from money, the settlement ought to meet public interest, environmental problems, and network involvement. Legislation compliance includes adhering to nearby laws, construction regulations, and regulatory necessities, all of which affect specific factors of the contractual framework. Because of the authorities’ dedication to sustainable development, provisions for environmental impact checks, green constructing strategies, and the challenge's overall social impact are required (Lock, 2020).

D. Critical Evaluation of the Contractual Requirements for the Government in Compliance With Legislation

To make sure compliance, the authorities’ contractual necessities must be cautiously assessed given the project's complexity. Compliance with neighborhood legal guidelines isn't normally a criminal necessity, however a mechanism for the government to protect the public. To make sure accountable use of public budget, the HK$540 million rate range requires strict monetary control and auditing (CHAPPELL, 2015).

As stated by Layton, Ostermiller and Kynaston (2020), protection, environmental, and honest work practices also are part of statutory compliance. For assignment participants to be responsible, the settlement needs to consist of harsh noncompliance penalties. For statutory compliance, the agreement ought to contain reporting strategies that permit common audits and perspectives. The fundamental evaluation stresses the contractual framework's strength in defensive criminal and moral standards. This massive infrastructure project necessitates combining the economic concerns of private partners with government objectives.

Task 2: Criteria for Contract Selection

A. Impact of Time, Cost, and Quality on the Selection of a Contract

The choice of the proper arrangement for the projected construction of the Flyover desires a thorough assessment of the relationship of time, value, and best. The undertaking budget of HK$540 million and time body of 56 months constitute a completely unique mixture of constraints and concern (Mutakyahwa and Marnewick, 2021).

Time: As stated by Olawale (2020), With a construction duration of 56-months, a contractual framework that optimizes task scheduling is required. When deciding on the perfect agreement, time becomes an important consideration, with problems for decreasing delays, taking part in milestones, and ensuring work crowning glory on agenda. A strong creative time table has an instantaneous influence on project expenses and stakeholder pleasure (Rics, 2023).

Cost: The HK$540 million price range imposes budgetary constraints that need cautious agreement choices. A fixed-price settlement may additionally provide fee truth, while a value-plus agreement may additionally offer flexibility however might also generate budgetary issues (CHAPPELL, 2012). To meet stakeholder expectancies, the option should blend fee-effectiveness with the need for economic truth.

Quality: The excellent of production has a direct impact at the lifespan and operation of the flyover. The contractual shape has to assure that the agreement chosen prioritizes and implements strict high-quality requirements. Quality problems have an impact on both money and time, for the reason that deviations from fine norms may bring about delays and higher price (Rozman, 2020).

B. Evaluation of How Time and Quality Considerations Affect the Cost of the Project

The courting between time, best, and value is complex, and careful assessment is critical for right venture management.

Time and Cost: Construction timetable delays regularly bring about better costs. The longer the building duration, the greater the labor, cloth, and system prices. As a result, powerful time management becomes a price-cutting approach. Attempts to hasten production, alternatively, may incur extra costs, necessitating a satisfactory stability to optimize assignment efficiency and financial outlays.

Quality and Cost: According to Turner (2022), while it's miles important to make sure outstanding construction, the hyperlink among first-class and fee is dynamic. Cutting shortcuts on first-class may additionally bring about less expensive on the spot prices, however it often leads to extra lengthy-term renovation expenses and likely criminal repercussions.

The agreement selection criteria ought to be influenced by a complete draw close of the sensitive interactions among time, value, and first-rate. Finding the proper stability guarantees that the venture is finished on time and under price range, at the same time as pleasing stakeholder expectancies for a long-lasting and price-effective infrastructure solution (Rowe, 2020).

C. Analysis of the Project in Terms of Contract Selection Criteria Satisfying Client Requirements

To assure patron pleasure inside the proposed Flyover creation, a radical takes a look at of the project against settlement selection standards is needed. With a project value of HK$540 million and a duration of 56 months, the agreement picked need to meet the particular needs and expectations of both industrial and government partners (Wu et al., 2019).

Client Requirements

1. Financial Transparency: The contract must consist of a comprehensive breakdown of fees, giving readability for the HK$540 million non-public consumer.

  1. Timely Completion: Due to the challenge's fifty six-month length, an agreement that prioritizes green production timelines and finishing key milestones is required.
  2. Quality Assurance: Adherence to excessive first-class requirements is important to ensuring the flyover's toughness and operation.

Contract Selection Criteria

  • Fixed-Price Contract: Gives the non-public purchaser monetary certainty.
  • Time and Materials Contract: Allows for flexibility as assignment wishes trade.
  • Performance-Based Contract: Aligns financial incentives with mission milestones, boosting task final touch on agenda.

D. Evaluation of Project Risks for All Stakeholders

Risk assessment is important to project success. The desk underneath covers viable hazards and mitigation options for all events engaged within the proposed Flyover production:

evaluavtion

Table 1: Evaluation of project risks for all stakeholders and mitigation strategies

(Source: Wu et al., 2019)

This entire danger evaluation tries to proactively pick out, analyses, and mitigate feasible troubles, encouraging all assignment stakeholders to paintings collaboratively and threat-resiliently.

Task 3: Analysis of Contract Types (Approx. 700 words)

A. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Selection of a Contract for Project Control and Management

As per Sousa (2019), the contract kind selected for the proposed construction of the flyover has a large impact on project control and management. Several problems come into play given the challenge's length, with a price estimate of HK$540 million and a period of 56-months.

Factors Influencing Contract Selection

1. Project Complexity: The sensitive nature of constructing a flyover, in conjunction with adjustments to present infrastructure, necessitates a settlement that permits for complexity. An Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) settlement that encourages stakeholder participation may also improve assignment manipulate.

2. Client Involvement: The degree to which a customer participates in selection-making impacts settlement selection. A Design-Build (DB) contract, in which the client works with a single corporation this is responsible for each design and production, would possibly simplify selection-making and improve task control (GODWIN, 2013).

  1. Budget Certainty: A Fixed-Price Contract meets the purchaser's want for price range clarity. This settlement form specifies a fixed mission fee, lowering the possibility of fee overruns.
  2. Time Sensitivity: Given the 56-month timescale, a Time and Materials (T&M) Contract may also provide for flexibility in challenge scope and design, allowing for any adjustments to be accommodated without incurring tremendous delays.

B. Comparing Forms of Standard Contracts in Terms of Achieving a Balanced Risk

The choice of an appropriate trendy settlement is important for balancing dangers amongst stakeholders. Given the project's complexity and scope, a comparative examine of usual settlement formats is required.

Forms of Standard Contracts

  1. Lump-Sum (Fixed-Price) Contract:
  • Benefits: Provides the client with cost reality since the contractor contains the danger of fee overruns.
  • Disadvantages: Contractors may upload contingencies in their notion, which might result in extra beginning prices.
  1. Cost-Reimbursable (Time and Materials) Contract:
  • Benefits: Allows for layout changes and revisions during creation, with charges spent based on actual paintings.
  • Disadvantages: Increases the patron's threat considering the fact that the full price is unknown until the mission is finished.
  1. Design-Build (DB) Contract:
  • Benefits: Simplifies choice-making by means of having a single body accountable for layout and creation, decreasing disputes.
  • Disadvantages: Transfers layout dangers to the contractor, perhaps resulting in better charges.
  1. Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) Contract:
  • Benefits: Promotes collaborative duty for mission outcomes through enhancing cooperation and risk-sharing amongst all venture stakeholders.
  • Disadvantages: Requires a high degree of confidence and collaboration amongst stakeholders, in addition to extra in advance charges.

Balancing Risks

  • A hybrid approach, along with a Design-Build-Operate-Maintain (DBOM) agreement, may offer an extra truthful risk allocation through incorporating the contractor in the operation and protection degrees, aligning their pastimes with the mission's lengthy-term performance.

C. Justification of the Selection of the Contract in Meeting the Strategic Values of the Client

To join the settlement selection with the consumer's strategic dreams, an in-depth cause is needed, taking into consideration the customer's goals in addition to the unique characteristics of the Proposed Construction of the Flyover.

Strategic Values and Justification

  1. Client's Strategic Values:
  • Financial prudence: The customer is looking for cost-effectiveness and price range balance.
  • On-Time Delivery: The consumer prioritizes adherence to the building timeline of 56-months (HUGHES et al ., 2015).
  • Quality Assurance: The purchaser emphasizes the flyover's sturdiness and usefulness.
  • 2. Selected Contract: Design-Build (DB) Contract

  • Justification:
  • Cost Consistency: The DB settlement strikes a stability among fee containment and flexibility. The purchaser benefits from having a unmarried factor of touch for each layout and creation, which reduces the threat of cost overruns.
  • Time Efficiency: Under a DB settlement, streamlining selection-making improves undertaking efficiency, maintaining with the client's awareness on activate transport.
  • Quality Assurance : Because DB contracts are included, they stimulate cooperation among the designer and builder, encouraging a shared dedication to strict high-quality standards.
  • 3. Mitigation Strategies

  • Including a selected scope of labor in the settlement to assure that every one customer wishes are met explicitly.
  • Putting in region a solid mission management method to track and manage costs, timeframes, and excellent standards.

A Design-Build contract corresponds with the client's strategic principles through supplying a balance of cost fact, on-time transport, and pleasant guarantee. This strategic alignment ensures that the contractual shape supports the overall pursuits of the proposed Flyover construction (Pedrini and Ferri, 2019).

Task 4: Selection and Preparation of Contract

A. Revised Standard Contract to Meet the Client's Requirements.

A huge change is required to healthy a traditional agreement with the particular wishes of the Proposed Construction of the Flyover. The desk under summarizes crucial changes in keeping with the client's objectives:

1 2

Table 2: Revised standard contract provisions

(Source: Zhu et al ., 2022)

B. Rationale for Defining Selected Terms and Conditions in the Contract Preparation.

The agreement's terms and conditions need to be cautiously selected and described to provide readability, minimize conflicts, and in shape the purchaser's strategic principles (Zhu et al ., 2022).

Rationale for Selected Terms and Conditions:

  1. Clear Scope of Work:
  • Goal: Avoid misunderstandings and misinterpretations.
  • Rationale: A nicely-described scope of work explains every birthday party's obligation, reducing the chance of disagreements and selling green venture control.
  1. Payment Schedule:
  • Goal: Financial transparency and finances certainty for the purchaser.
  • Rationale: Payment milestones which might be honestly described and linked to venture milestones permit transparency, economic predictability, and efficient price control.
  1. Performance Guarantees:
  • Goal: Ensure first-class and assignment standards are met.
  • Rationale: Including performance guarantees maintains the contractor liable for adhering to strict first-rate standards, which aligns with the customer's attention on sturdiness and value.
  1. Dispute Resolution Mechanisms:
  • Goal: Accelerate dispute decision.
  • Rationale: Establishing explicit war resolution methods, including mediation or arbitration, guarantees fast agreement, minimizing delays to the mission timeline.

C. Comparing Terms and Conditions of Similar Contracts to Meet Clients’ Requirements.

Comparing phrases and conditions with similar contracts exhibits enterprise high-quality practices and permits for further customization to in shape the customer's particular needs.

Comparison of Selected Contract Terms

  1. Cost Control:
  • Comparable Contracts: Fixed-price agreements with unique value breakdowns.
  • Client Requirement: Comply with price transparency requirements by way of supplying a thorough cost breakdown.
  1. Timeline Adherence:
  • Contracts with Similar timetables: Various contracts have venture-specific timetables.
  • Client Requirement: Adjust the development timetable to fulfil the 56-month closing date, assuring project of completion on time.
  1. Quality Assurance:
  • Similar Contracts: Contracts for extensive infrastructure initiatives should adhere to strict satisfactory necessities.
  • Client Requirement: Specify even more stringent satisfactory standards and checking out techniques to assure the flyover's persistence and operation.
  1. Flexibility for Changes:
  • Contracts which are comparable: Some contracts allow for modification orders with particular processes.
  • Client Requirement: Increase layout flexibility by using giving specific methods and cost effects, at the same time as balancing adaptability and price control.

D. Collaboration Between Contractors and Subcontractors Influences Contractual Arrangements

Collaboration among contractors and subcontractors has a widespread impact at the success of contractual agreements, in particular inside the context of the proposed Flyover creation (HUGHES, 2015).

Influence of Collaboration

  1. Efficiency in Project Execution:
  • Collaborative efforts by way of Contractors and subcontractors enhance task performance with the aid of minimizing delays and adhering to settlement timeframes (Tam et al., 2020).
  1. Risk Mitigation:
  • Collaborative efforts allow shared hazard control strategies, with contractors and subcontractors identifying and coping with viable risks collaboratively, in accordance with the contract's usual hazard distribution.
  1. Quality Assurance:
  • Effective cooperation promotes verbal exchange and coordination, making sure that excessive nice requirements are met at some stage in the building system.
  1. Timely Conflict Resolution:
  • Collaborative connections between contractors and subcontractors contribute to a proactive technique to struggle decision, ensuring that any disagreements are settled speedy to keep away from task agenda troubles.

The collaborative participation of contractors and subcontractors is important to the effective execution of the proposed Flyover creation. Effective verbal exchange and shared duties cause extra efficient project control, which aligns with the objectives indicated in the updated agreement and meets the customer's strategic value (Turfboer and Silvius, 2021).

Recommendations

This record's unique take a look at for the Proposed Construction of the Flyover generates various high-degree proposals. To start with, maintaining stakeholder involvement encourages obvious verbal exchange and shared obligation. Furthermore, it's far essential to very well observe progressive settlement strategies and Design-Build contracts on the way to optimize interest performance and ensure client pride. A powerful chance management method which includes present day chance strategies and contingency plans is vital for lowering uncertainty. Monitoring and reporting have to be used to fulfil contractual duties and make well timed selections. Moreover, presenting ongoing schooling on settlement administration strategies to mission organizations may additionally beautify adaptability and promote exemplary methods in fundamental infrastructure initiatives. These regulations will facilitate the achievement of the fly-past venture and provide valuable insights for future endeavors.

Conclusion

Ultimately, this message became sent out using the Proposed Flyover Development as a platform, emphasizing the intricacies concerned in manufacturing contracts. The assessment of contractual obligations, choice standards, and styles of agreements highlighted the want of accomplishing a balance between time, fee, and first-class. Contracts ought to be consistent with the values of stakeholders, mainly the purchaser. Contract management has emerged as essential to reaching challenge goals, making sure monetary prudence, and fostering collaborative achievement. Finally, the article highlights the need of thorough settlement path in leading huge infrastructure initiatives towards success at the same time as protecting stakeholders' person pastimes.

Reference List

Allen, J., Harris, R., Jago, L., Tantrai, A., Jonson, P. and D'Arcy, E., 2022. Festival and special event management. John Wiley & Sons.

CHAPPELL, D. (2012) Understanding JCT Standard Building Contracts, Routledge.

CHAPPELL, D. (2015) Construction Contracts Questions and Answers, 3rd Ed., Routledge.

Crawford, J.K., 2021. Project management maturity model. CRC Press.

Devb, 2023 Available At: https://www.devb.gov.hk/en/publications_and_press_releases/publications/index.html. Accessed On: [10th December 2023]

GODWIN, W. (2013) International Construction Contracts: A Handbook, Wiley.

Gubinelli, S., Cesarotti, V. and Introna, V., 2019. The evolution of Project Management (PM): How Agile, Lean and Six Sigma are changing PM. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 7(3).

Hkis, 2023 www.hkis.org.hk Available At: https://www.hkis.org.hk/en/index.html. Accessed On: [10th December 2023]

HUGHES, W., CHAMPION, R. and MURDOCH, J. (2015) Construction Contracts Law and Management, 5th Ed. Routledge.

HUGHES, W.B. (2015) Construction Contract, Routledge.

Layton, M.C., Ostermiller, S.J. and Kynaston, D.J., 2020. Agile project management for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.

Lock, D., 2020. Project management. Routledge.

Mutakyahwa, A. and Marnewick, C., 2021. Information technology governance practices and stakeholder management: A multinational organisational perspective. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 9(1).

Olawale, Y.A., 2020. Challenges to prevent in practice for effective cost and time control of construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 10(1), pp.16-32.

Pedrini, M. and Ferri, L.M., 2019. Stakeholder management: a systematic literature review. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), pp.44-59.

Rics, 2023 www.rics.org Available At: https://www.rics.org/. Accessed On: [10th December 2023]

Rodney Turner, J., 2022. Using Principal–Steward Contracting and Scenario Planning to Manage Megaprojects. Project Management Journal, 53(1), pp.8-16.

Rowe, S.F., 2020. Project management for small projects. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Rozman, T., 2020. Virtual collaboration tools for project managers: A study of human and technological factors. In Handbook of research on the role of human factors in IT project management (pp. 368-395). IGI Global.

Sousa, M.J. and Rocha, Á., 2019. Skills for disruptive digital business. Journal of Business Research, 94, pp.257-263.

Tam, C., da Costa Moura, E.J., Oliveira, T. and Varajão, J., 2020. The factors influencing the success of on-going agile software development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), pp.165-176.

Turfboer, J. and Silvius, G., 2021. Start marketing your project; The relationships of Marketing BY the project with stakeholder engagement and project success. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 9(2).

Turner, J.R., 2022. The handbook of project-based management. Prentice Hall.

Wu, G., Hu, Z. and Zheng, J., 2019. Role stress, job burnout, and job performance in construction project managers: the moderating role of career calling. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(13), p.2394.

Zhu, H., Hwang, B.G., Ngo, J. and Tan, J.P.S., 2022. Applications of smart technologies in construction project management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(4), p.04022010.

You Might Also Like:

Building and Construction Assignment Help

Assignment of the Week: Essay on Civil War And Reconstruction

ENGG929 Design, Construction and Maintenance of Rolling Stock Assignment Sample

Hey MAS, I need Assignment Sample of

Get It Done! Today

Country
Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
+
  • 1,212,718Orders

  • 4.9/5Rating

  • 5,063Experts

Highlights

  • 21 Step Quality Check
  • 2000+ Ph.D Experts
  • Live Expert Sessions
  • Dedicated App
  • Earn while you Learn with us
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Money Back Guarantee
  • Customer Feedback

Just Pay for your Assignment

  • Turnitin Report

    $10.00
  • Proofreading and Editing

    $9.00Per Page
  • Consultation with Expert

    $35.00Per Hour
  • Live Session 1-on-1

    $40.00Per 30 min.
  • Quality Check

    $25.00
  • Total

    Free
  • Let's Start

Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today

Browse across 1 Million Assignment Samples for Free

Explore All Assignment Samples

Request Callback

My Assignment Services- Whatsapp Get Best OffersOn WhatsApp

Get 500 Words FREE