BOX- 1
This paper explores the impact that traditional and agile methods of project management have on the realisation of successful project outcomes within the context of a difficult project environment characterised by VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity) elements. While the study's findings are generally helpful, there are some areas in which they differ from the author's and others in which they are supported.
The study does a fantastic job of highlighting the risks that environmental factors like uncertainty, ambiguity, volatility, and technological complexity pose to a project's success (de Moura et al., 2023). This fits well with the conventional wisdom that outside influences significantly affect a project's outcome.
The findings stress the significance of tailoring project management strategies to specific contexts. Since it's possible that there isn't a single, universal answer to the problems plaguing projects, and since adaptability is crucial to success, this makes sense.
The paper's observation that agile approaches help lessen the toll that volatility takes on project success is in line with the agile methodology's guiding principles, which stress nimbleness and responsiveness to change.
The text has a tendency to oversimplify the differences between traditional and agile methods of project management. These approaches exist on a spectrum in practice, with many businesses using hybrid methods that combine elements of both to meet the needs of specific projects (Malik et al., 2020). The complexity of project management in the real world may be too great to be captured by a simple binary classification.
This article does not delve deeply into the ways in which a company's culture can affect the approach it takes to project management. When there is a mismatch between the organization's culture and the chosen approach, it might have a negative effect on the project's success.
Even if the paper hints that agile methodologies can mitigate the effects of volatility, it does not dive extensively into the limitations of agile, such as whether it is relevant to highly regulated industries or projects with stringent compliance requirements.
It's likely that the study's findings don't generalise because they were generated from a specific context. The article glosses over certain key factors that contribute to a project's success, but they must be taken into account. The size of the project, type of business, and stakeholder expectations are all things to think about.
BOX- 2
BOX-3
Agile frameworks Scrum can be applied in the first case. The table shows that this alignment is accomplished because of the method's use of two-week sprint cycles and Scrum-specific roles like Product Owner and Scrum Master (Ormeño Zender & García de Soto, 2020). Scrum is a framework for agile software development that emphasizes small, incremental changes, well-defined roles, and short iterations.
Case 2 seems to fit in with the Kanban approach to agile development. The data in the table, which addresses such topics as ensuring a constant stream of work, capping the number of active tasks, and mapping out the workflow on a board, lend credence to this assessment. These are the cornerstones of the Kanban approach, whose overarching goal is to boost productivity.
Example 1 (using Scrum) demonstrated a 20% improvement in quality. Scrum's iterative and collaborative approach often leads to better communication and higher-quality deliverables, which is why it has become so popular (Coimbra et al., 2023). The early discovery and resolution of issues is aided by elements such as regular feedback loops and testing performed inside sprints.
The second instance (Kanban) showed a 15% cut in costs. To better allocate resources and prioritise activities, reduce duplication of effort, and save money, Kanban places a premium on limiting work in progress (Ormeño Zender & García de Soto, 2020).
In Example 1 (Scrum), 10% of the original time needed to deliver the product was saved. Scrum's time constraints on each sprint encourage urgency and predictability, leading to faster iterative releases of new features.
f- Agile techniques naturally encourage these outcomes because of their emphasis on collaboration, openness, and flexibility. Scrum's standard roles and procedures help teams stay aligned and respond quickly to any quality issues (Coimbra et al., 2023). Kanban's focus on flow and the elimination of WIP limits aids in efficient resource allocation. Both approaches prioritize ongoing improvement, which has the dual benefits of reducing project costs and accelerating progress.
BOX- 4
BOX-5
The core principles of the Agile Manifesto and the deployment of some Agile practices can be traced back to the influence of the Lean philosophy. The principles of "Respect for People" and "Eliminating Waste" from the Lean philosophy have been instrumental in the evolution of the Agile methodology.
"Simplicity, the art of maximizing the amount of work not done, is essential," reads the first principle of the Agile Manifesto.
Agile methodology encourages teams to focus on the most important tasks, eliminate those that aren't essential, and create "minimum viable products" (MVPs). This not only increases the value provided but also reduces waste (Dieste et al., 2021).
Agile teams are driven to eliminate waste throughout the software development process by the Lean principle of continuous improvement.
The Agile Manifesto states, "Individuals and interactions over processes and tools."
In Agile, people and their connections are prioritized, with an emphasis on teamwork, transparency, and initiative.
"Customer collaboration over contract negotiation places an emphasis on the demands of the customer and welcomes input from end users throughout the development process.
Agile's focus on simplicity and getting rid of everything that isn't adding value was inspired by the "Eliminating Waste" principle of Lean.
Lean's "Respect for People" concept, which argued for a more human-centered approach, influenced Agile's "Respect for People" philosophy.
Agile is based on these Lean principles, which led to the development of methods that boost productivity, please clients, and make it easier to respond to change. As a result of their adaptability and customer-centricity in project management and product production, agile approaches have seen widespread adoption, and not just in the software development industry (Lee & Xing Qi, 2021). This exemplifies the far-reaching influence of the Lean mindset.
Belling, S. (2020). Agile History. Succeeding with Agile Hybrids, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-6461-4_4
Coimbra, H., Cormican, K., McDermott, O., & Antony, J. (2023). Leading the transformation: agile success factors in an Irish manufacturing company. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2023.2214515
de Moura, R. L. 1, Carneiro, T. C. J. 2, & Dias, T. L. 2 1 F. I. E.-S. (2023). VUCA environment on project success: The effect of project management methods. ProQuest, 236–259. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2023.20.3.1.en
Dieste, M., Panizzolo, R., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2021). A systematic literature review regarding the influence of lean manufacturing on firms’ financial performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(9), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-08-2020-0304
Kanban overview - Agile Foundations Video Tutorial | LinkedIn Learning, formerly Lynda.com. (n.d.). LinkedIn. Retrieved October 9, 2023, from https://www.linkedin.com/learning/agile-foundations/kanban- overview?autoAdvance=true&autoSkip=false&autoplay=true&resume=false&u=567
Kent Beck – Keynote Speaker. (n.d.). London Speaker Bureau. Retrieved October 9, 2023, from https://londonspeakerbureau.com/speaker-profile/kent-beck/
Lee, K. L., & Xing Qi, T. (2021). The Effect of Lean and Agile Practices on Supply Chain Operational Performance in Malaysia Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Industrial Management, 12(1), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijim.12.1.2021.6639
Lowell, K. R. (2023). Using the Agile Manifesto as a Framework. Future of Business and Finance, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36429-7_4
Malik, M., Sarwar, S., & Orr, S. (2020). Agile practices and performance: Examining the role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Project Management, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.09.002
Ormeño Zender, Y., & García de Soto, B. (2020). Use of Scrum in the rehabilitation of a commercial building in Peru. Construction Innovation, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-12-2019-0140
You Might Also Like:
Agile or Waterfall Development
Agile Project Management Assignment Help
1,212,718Orders
4.9/5Rating
5,063Experts
Turnitin Report
$10.00Proofreading and Editing
$9.00Per PageConsultation with Expert
$35.00Per HourLive Session 1-on-1
$40.00Per 30 min.Quality Check
$25.00Total
FreeGet
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Get
500 Words Free
on your assignment today
Request Callback
Doing your Assignment with our resources is simple, take Expert assistance to ensure HD Grades. Here you Go....
🚨Don't Leave Empty-Handed!🚨
Snag a Sweet 70% OFF on Your Assignments! 📚💡
Grab it while it's hot!🔥
Claim Your DiscountHurry, Offer Expires Soon 🚀🚀