Steps and Reasons for Critiquing Scientific Articles – Assessment Answer

Introduction

A critique is referred to as a systematic anew of reviewing a research piece objectively in order to highlight both the weaknesses and strengths of the article as well as the applicability to various practices. It has been found that professionals often require to have the ability to identify the current practice which is best and they should be able to assess and use the published research (Boddington, 2011). Critique is important to the entire functioning of all of the scientific journals and it also plays a significant role in the publication of the new scientific materials. The paper mainly revolves around various aspects of critiquing a scientific article. The paper includes a short introduction. Then the paper discusses about the topic in depth. Lastly, the main findings of the paper have been concluded briefly.

Main Body

Various Reasons for the Critiquing Scientific Article

Critiquing scientific articles helps to empower individuals to decide whether they have to change their practice on the basis of what they read. Critique has been found to reflect on the effectiveness and validity of the arguments of an author in an article. Critiquing an article helps the audience to comprehend with the main points of the article as well as the ideas and intentions of the authors (Flinders, 2023). It indicates a perceived success of the article and an evaluation of the weakness and strengths of the article. Critiquing is considered as a systematic process for assessing the studies of research and the outcome reported. An article is critiqued in order to determine whether the findings of the article can be used for practice. It also helps the writers. Critique mainly signals the contribution of reviewers to the existing knowledge of scholars and it is considered that critiques are a significant way for novice scholars to do their authentic academic tasks (Balon, 2022). Critiquing research also helps to broaden the overall understanding for utilization in practice and for implementing the evidence-based practice of nursing. It also has been found to motivate nurses to participate within the process of clinical inquiry and offers evidence for utilization in practice. A critic examines a paper for understanding the elements of the process of research. It has been also found that critiquing a nursing research paper helps nurses to stay up-to-date in scientific literature. In accordance with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, the rigorous research of nursing offers a knowledge body that helps the advance practice of nursing. Critiquing also helps the researchers and professionals to learn from each other and it becomes accountable for the own ideas of the researchers. Its processes aid in the establishment of the skills of research (Grainger, 2021). The critique that is constructive helps to guide the researchers that whether they are practicing the good article or the bad ones. Analyzing the importance of critiquing scientific research, it can be said that critiquing is important for professionals and one should not trust any article before critiquing the article as this impact their practice negatively. In a professional field, bad practice leads to a bad outcome which is not at all acceptable in the nursing field.

Steps to Critique a Scientific Article

In order to critique a scientific article, there are some steps that need to be followed as this helps in critiquing an article in a good manner. The very first step which needs to be considered in collecting basic information. Regardless of the subject of the article which needs to be reviewed, the paper contains some basic information (Krause, 2021). The basic information which should be collected is the title of the article, the title of the journal along with the month, and the date of the article. It is also important to collect the issue statement, research method, purpose, key findings, approach, and hypothesis. While collecting the basic information, one should read the entire article 2 or three times. This helps to provide a general overview of the article. After collecting the information and reading the article, the next step should be writing it down. The steps to be followed are introduction. in this section, one should discuss the issue, review of relevant literature and then should review the hypothesis. After the introduction, the method part should be reviewed. Within the methodology part, one should review the participants chosen by the author in order to carry out the research and along with this the instruments used in the article should also be reviewed. It has been found that the procedures and the design are an important part of the methodology and while critiquing an article, reviewing this part helps a lot in making a sound decision (Sng et al., 2016). Along with reviewing the procedures and the designs, it is equally important to check the sampling made in the article. The results of the article are then reviewed in order to check whether it is valid or not. This part also helps to compare various articles. Results also help to understand whether the author has presented a proper descriptive statistics and it also helps to comprehend that whether the results are logical and clear.

Another step that is significant for completing the critique of a scientific article is to review the ethics of the article it needs to check that whether the article is approved by any university or by any other means as above all it is very important for the article to comply with the ethical principles (Stratfordjournals, 2020). This also helps to govern standards of the conduct for scientific researchers. It is also significant to adhere to ethical principles as this helps to protect the rights, welfare, and dignity of the research participants. After completing all of the steps, lastly, a conclusion should be drawn on its own regarding the positive sides, negative sides, strengths weaknesses, effectiveness and applicability of the scientific research.

Conclusion

A critique is referred to as a systematic anew of reviewing a research piece objectively in order to highlight both the weaknesses and strengths of the article as well as the applicability to various practices. It has been found that professionals often require to have the ability to identify the current practice which is best and they should be able to assess and use the published research are critical in reaching this. Analyzing the entire thing, it can be said that critiquing a scientific article is much more important for professionals as they use those research in their practice. Hence, knowing about the positive sides and drawbacks of an article will help them to carry their practice in better way.

References

Balon, R. (2022). What is a review article and what are its purpose, attributes, and goal(s). Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 91(3), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.1159/000522385

Boddington, P. (2011). Why research ethics? why ethics in genetics? the case of genomics research. Ethical Challenges in Genomics Research, 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23699-0_2

Flinders. (2023). Critiquing research articles - flinders university. https://students.flinders.edu.au/. Retrieved April 9, 2023, from https://students.flinders.edu.au/content/dam/student/slc/critiquing-research-articles.pdf

Grainger, A. (2021). Critiquing a published healthcare research paper. British Journal of Nursing, 30(6), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.6.354

Krause, S. D. (2021, March 23). 8.1: What's a critique and why does it matter? Humanities LibreTexts. Retrieved April 9, 2023, from https://human.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Composition/Advanced_Composition/Book%3A_The_Process_of_Research_Writing_(Krause)/08%3A_The_Critique_Exercise/8.01%3A_Whats_a_Critique_and_Why_Does_it_Matter#:~:text=Critiques%20evaluate%20and%20analyze%20a,usually%20suggests%20a%20negative%20interpretation.

Sng, B. L., Yip, C., & Han, N.-L. R. (2016). Legal and ethical issues in research. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60(9), 684. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190627

Stratfordjournals. (2020, March 30). How to critique a journal article. Stratford Peer Reviewed Journals & books. Retrieved April 9, 2023, from https://stratfordjournals.org/how-to-critique-a-journal-article/

You Might Also Like

Article Critique Assignment Help

5 Do’s and Don’ts: Writing an Article Critique

Research Critique Article - Assessment Answer

Looking For Complete Assignment Sample Get It On WhatsApp